selftest/bpf: Test accesses to ctx padding

This patch adds tests covering the various paddings in ctx structures.
In case of sk_lookup BPF programs, the behavior is a bit different
because accesses to the padding are explicitly allowed. Other cases
result in a clear reject from the verifier.

Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>

Author: pchaigno

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ctx.c

@@ -262,4 +262,28 @@ narrow_load("sockops", bpf_sock_ops, skb_hwtstamp);
 unaligned_access("flow_dissector", __sk_buff, data);
 unaligned_access("netfilter", bpf_nf_ctx, skb);
 
+#define padding_access(type, ctx, prev_field, sz)			\
+	SEC(type)							\
+	__description("access on " #ctx " padding after " #prev_field)	\
+	__naked void padding_ctx_access_##ctx(void)			\
+	{								\
+		asm volatile ("						\
+		r1 = *(u%[size] *)(r1 + %[off]);			\
+		r0 = 0;							\
+		exit;"							\
+		:							\
+		: __imm_const(size, sz * 8),				\
+		  __imm_const(off, offsetofend(struct ctx, prev_field))	\
+		: __clobber_all);					\
+	}
+
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+padding_access("cgroup/bind4", bpf_sock_addr, msg_src_ip6[3], 4);
+
+__success
+padding_access("sk_lookup", bpf_sk_lookup, remote_port, 2);
+
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+padding_access("tc", __sk_buff, tstamp_type, 2);
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";