fuse: fix fuse_fill_write_pages() upper bound calculation

This fixes a bug in commit 63c69ad ("fuse: refactor
fuse_fill_write_pages()") where max_pages << PAGE_SHIFT is mistakenly
used as the calculation for the max_pages upper limit but there's the
possibility that copy_folio_from_iter_atomic() may copy over bytes
from the iov_iter that are less than the full length of the folio,
which would lead to exceeding max_pages.

This commit fixes it by adding a 'ap->num_folios < max_folios' check.

Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
Fixes: 63c69ad ("fuse: refactor fuse_fill_write_pages()")
Tested-by: Brian Foster <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Brian Foster <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/aEq4haEQScwHIWK6@bfoster/
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>

Author: joannekoong

fs/fuse/file.c

@@ -1147,7 +1147,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_send_write_pages(struct fuse_io_args *ia,
 static ssize_t fuse_fill_write_pages(struct fuse_io_args *ia,
 				     struct address_space *mapping,
 				     struct iov_iter *ii, loff_t pos,
-				     unsigned int max_pages)
+				     unsigned int max_folios)
 {
 	struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &ia->ap;
 	struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(mapping->host);
@@ -1157,12 +1157,11 @@ static ssize_t fuse_fill_write_pages(struct fuse_io_args *ia,
 	int err = 0;
 
 	num = min(iov_iter_count(ii), fc->max_write);
-	num = min(num, max_pages << PAGE_SHIFT);
 
 	ap->args.in_pages = true;
 	ap->descs[0].offset = offset;
 
-	while (num) {
+	while (num && ap->num_folios < max_folios) {
 		size_t tmp;
 		struct folio *folio;
 		pgoff_t index = pos >> PAGE_SHIFT;