x86/platform/amd: move final timeout check to after final sleep

__hsmp_send_message sleeps between result read attempts and has a
timeout of 100ms. Under extreme load it's possible for these sleeps to
take a long time, exceeding the 100ms. In this case the current code
does not check the register and fails with ETIMEDOUT.

Refactor the loop to ensure there is at least one read of the register
after a sleep of any duration. This removes instances of ETIMEDOUT with
a single caller, even with a misbehaving scheduler. Tested on AMD
Bergamo machines.

Suggested-by: Blaise Sanouillet <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Suma Hegde <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Suma Hegde <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jake Hillion <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]>

Author: JakeHillion

drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/hsmp.c

@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static int __hsmp_send_message(struct hsmp_socket *sock, struct hsmp_message *ms
 	short_sleep = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(HSMP_SHORT_SLEEP);
 	timeout	= jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(HSMP_MSG_TIMEOUT);
 
-	while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
+	while (true) {
 		ret = sock->amd_hsmp_rdwr(sock, mbinfo->msg_resp_off, &mbox_status, HSMP_RD);
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_err(sock->dev, "Error %d reading mailbox status\n", ret);
@@ -106,6 +106,10 @@ static int __hsmp_send_message(struct hsmp_socket *sock, struct hsmp_message *ms
 
 		if (mbox_status != HSMP_STATUS_NOT_READY)
 			break;
+
+		if (!time_before(jiffies, timeout))
+			break;
+
 		if (time_before(jiffies, short_sleep))
 			usleep_range(50, 100);
 		else