This document outlines the roadmap for improving the testing suite for the AI Cyberattack Defense project. The current testing infrastructure provides basic functionality, but there are opportunities to enhance coverage, automation, and reliability.
-
Unit Tests (
tests/unit/)- Basic detection algorithm tests
- Model validation tests
- Ollama client tests
- Coverage: ~60% of core functionality
-
Integration Tests (
tests/integration/)- Dashboard component tests
- Detector-simulator integration
- AI workflow tests
- Limited coverage of end-to-end scenarios
-
Manual Test Plan (
docs/TEST_PLAN.md)- Comprehensive manual test procedures
- 15 test scenarios covering all features
- Performance benchmarks defined
-
Demo Scripts
tools/demo_dashboard.py- Automated dashboard demotools/cli_test.py- CLI testing tooltests/e2e/test_dashboard_e2e.py- End-to-end dashboard tests
- CI/CD Integration: Tests not fully integrated into CI pipeline
- Coverage Gaps: Some components lack test coverage
- Test Data: Limited test data sets and fixtures
- Performance Tests: No automated performance benchmarking
- Mocking: Limited use of mocks for external dependencies
- Test Documentation: Some tests lack clear documentation
-
Expand Unit Test Coverage
- Target: 80%+ code coverage
- Focus areas:
- Detection algorithms (all edge cases)
- Database operations
- Vector database operations
- Configuration management
- Error handling
-
Improve Test Organization
- Better test structure and naming
- Consistent test fixtures
- Shared test utilities
- Clear test documentation
-
Add Mocking Infrastructure
- Mock Ollama API calls
- Mock database operations
- Mock external services
- Isolated unit tests
-
Enhance Integration Tests
- More end-to-end scenarios
- Better test data management
- Automated cleanup
- Parallel test execution
-
Performance Testing
- Automated performance benchmarks
- Load testing for dashboard
- Stress testing for detection engine
- Memory leak detection
-
Property-Based Testing
- Use Hypothesis for Python tests
- Generate test cases automatically
- Test edge cases systematically
-
Visual Regression Testing
- Screenshot comparison for dashboard
- UI component testing
- Chart rendering validation
-
Security Testing
- Security vulnerability scanning
- Input validation testing
- SQL injection testing
- XSS testing
-
Comprehensive Test Suite
- 90%+ code coverage
- All critical paths tested
- Automated regression testing
- Continuous test execution
-
Test Automation
- Fully automated test execution
- CI/CD integration
- Test result reporting
- Failure analysis
-
Test Data Management
- Comprehensive test datasets
- Synthetic attack patterns
- Real-world traffic samples (anonymized)
- Test data versioning
Objectives:
- Set up improved test infrastructure
- Create shared test utilities
- Establish testing patterns
Tasks:
- Create
tests/fixtures/directory for shared test data - Create
tests/utils/for test helpers - Set up pytest plugins and configuration
- Create base test classes
- Document testing patterns
Deliverables:
- Improved test structure
- Test utilities library
- Testing guidelines document
Objectives:
- Increase unit test coverage to 80%+
- Improve test quality
- Add missing test cases
Tasks:
- Review coverage report
- Identify gaps in coverage
- Write tests for uncovered code
- Improve existing tests
- Add edge case tests
Deliverables:
- 80%+ code coverage
- Comprehensive unit test suite
- Coverage report
Objectives:
- Expand integration test coverage
- Improve test reliability
- Add end-to-end scenarios
Tasks:
- Review integration test scenarios
- Add missing integration tests
- Improve test data management
- Add cleanup procedures
- Test parallel execution
Deliverables:
- Enhanced integration test suite
- Reliable test execution
- End-to-end test scenarios
Objectives:
- Add performance testing
- Implement property-based testing
- Add security testing
Tasks:
- Set up performance testing framework
- Create performance benchmarks
- Implement Hypothesis for property-based testing
- Add security test cases
- Integrate security scanning
Deliverables:
- Performance test suite
- Property-based tests
- Security test cases
- pytest: Python testing framework
- pytest-cov: Coverage reporting
- pytest-mock: Mocking support
- pytest-asyncio: Async test support
-
Hypothesis: Property-based testing
pip install hypothesis
-
pytest-benchmark: Performance benchmarking
pip install pytest-benchmark
-
pytest-xdist: Parallel test execution
pip install pytest-xdist
-
pytest-html: HTML test reports
pip install pytest-html
-
faker: Generate test data
pip install faker
-
freezegun: Time mocking
pip install freezegun
tests/
├── unit/
│ ├── detection/
│ │ ├── test_ai_pattern_detector.py
│ │ └── test_enhanced_detector.py
│ ├── ai_analysis/
│ │ ├── test_ollama_client.py
│ │ └── test_threat_analyzer.py
│ ├── simulation/
│ │ └── test_attack_simulator.py
│ └── utils/
│ ├── test_database.py
│ └── test_vector_db.py
├── integration/
│ ├── test_dashboard_workflow.py
│ ├── test_detection_pipeline.py
│ └── test_ai_integration.py
├── performance/
│ ├── test_detection_performance.py
│ └── test_dashboard_performance.py
├── fixtures/
│ ├── sample_requests.py
│ ├── attack_patterns.py
│ └── test_data.py
├── utils/
│ ├── test_helpers.py
│ └── mock_factories.py
└── conftest.py
- Overall: ~60%
- Detection: ~70%
- AI Analysis: ~50%
- Dashboard: ~40%
- Utils: ~65%
- Overall: 85%+
- Detection: 90%+
- AI Analysis: 80%+
- Dashboard: 75%+
- Utils: 90%+
- Code Coverage: 85%+ overall
- Test Execution Time: < 5 minutes for full suite
- Test Reliability: 99%+ pass rate
- Test Documentation: 100% of tests documented
- Test Maintainability: Clear, readable tests
- Follow AAA Pattern: Arrange, Act, Assert
- One Assertion Per Test: Focus on single behavior
- Descriptive Test Names: Clear what is being tested
- Use Fixtures: Reusable test data
- Mock External Dependencies: Isolated tests
- Test Edge Cases: Boundary conditions
- Document Complex Tests: Explain why, not just what
import pytest
from ai_tools.detection.ai_pattern_detector import AIPatternDetector
from tests.fixtures.sample_requests import create_attack_request
class TestAIPatternDetector:
"""Test suite for AIPatternDetector class."""
@pytest.fixture
def detector(self):
"""Create detector instance for testing."""
return AIPatternDetector()
def test_detect_superhuman_speed(self, detector):
"""Test detection of superhuman speed attacks.
Verifies that requests exceeding the speed threshold
are correctly identified as superhuman_speed pattern.
"""
# Arrange
requests = create_attack_request(count=20, rate=15) # 15 req/s
# Act
detections = [detector.analyze_request(req) for req in requests]
# Assert
assert any(d.pattern_type == "superhuman_speed" for d in detections)
assert any(d.threat_score >= 40 for d in detections)- Basic CI workflow
- Tests not blocking merges
- Limited test execution
- Full test suite execution in CI
- Test results reporting
- Coverage reporting
- Performance regression detection
- Test failure notifications
- Test Documentation: Each test should have docstring
- Test Plan Updates: Keep TEST_PLAN.md current
- Testing Guide: Create testing guide for contributors
- Coverage Reports: Regular coverage reports
- Test Results: Publish test results
- ✅ Test infrastructure improved
- ✅ Shared utilities created
- ✅ Testing patterns established
- ✅ 80%+ code coverage achieved
- ✅ All critical paths tested
- ✅ Test quality improved
- ✅ Integration tests enhanced
- ✅ End-to-end scenarios covered
- ✅ Tests reliable and fast
- ✅ Performance tests implemented
- ✅ Property-based tests added
- ✅ Security tests in place
- pytest Documentation: https://docs.pytest.org/
- Hypothesis Documentation: https://hypothesis.readthedocs.io/
- Testing Best Practices: See CONTRIBUTING.md
- Current Test Plan: See TEST_PLAN.md
This testing roadmap is informed by:
- Software Testing Best Practices: Myers, G. J., Sandler, C., & Badgett, T. (2011). The Art of Software Testing (3rd ed.). Wiley.
- Property-Based Testing: Claessen, K., & Hughes, J. (2000). QuickCheck: A lightweight tool for random testing of Haskell programs. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 35(9), 268-279.
- Test-Driven Development: Beck, K. (2002). Test-Driven Development: By Example. Addison-Wesley Professional.
Status: Planning Phase
Last Updated: November 2025
Next Review: December 2025