Update GA graduation criteria

1. Convert to check list.

2. Re-order so that completed items come first.

3. Update tuning item to refer to the whole interface (e.g, including
logs and metrics) rather than just the API.

4. Update the tuning item to replace "auto-tuning" with simply
"tuning".  The thinking is that the proper focus is on observability
and controllabiility; automation of the tuning was always intended to
be a matter for later consideration.

Author: MikeSpreitzer

keps/sig-api-machinery/1040-priority-and-fairness/README.md

@@ -2834,11 +2834,11 @@ Beta:
 
 GA:
 
-- Satisfaction with LIST and WATCH support.
-- API annotations properly support strategic merge patch.
-- APF allows us to disable client-side rate limiting without causing the apiservers to wedge/crash.  Note that there is another level of concern that APF does not attempt to address, which is mismatch between the throughput that various controllers can sustain.
-- Design and implement borrowing between priority levels.
-- Satisfaction that the API is sufficient to support auto-tuning of capacity and resource costs.
+- [x] API annotations properly support strategic merge patch.
+- [x] Design and implement borrowing between priority levels.
+- [ ] Satisfaction with LIST and WATCH support.
+- [ ] APF allows us to disable client-side rate limiting without causing the apiservers to wedge/crash.  Note that there is another level of concern that APF does not attempt to address, which is mismatch between the throughput that various controllers can sustain.
+- [ ] Satisfaction that the interface is sufficient to support tuning of capacity and resource costs.
 
 ## Production Readiness Review Questionnaire