Skip to content

refactor: noasm to purego #989

@leongross

Description

@leongross

Is there a good reason to use the noasm tag in this project contrary to adapting the build tag purego? As I see it, they both mean the same thing or am I confusing concepts here?
The Golang Standard Library utilizes this build tags for e.g. generic cryptography implementations.
It might be a good idea to adjust this project's build tags to the widely adopted scheme.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions