Is the quic speed abnormal?

[nicelic]

Hello,
The server uses the following format:
{
order forward_proxy before file_server
}
:443, example.com {
tls me@example.com
forward_proxy {
basic_auth user pass
hide_ip
hide_via
probe_resistance
}
file_server {
root /var/www/html
}
}
This format.

The client uses the following format:
{
"listen": "socks://127.0.0.1:1080",
"proxy": "quic://user:pass@example.com"
}

Both use the GitHub parameter format, but I'm experiencing unusually slow QUIC connections when deployed on multiple VPSs. When using QUIC, the speed is only a few hundred kilobits, but my VPS and home bandwidth don't limit UDP or QUIC speeds. When deploying other protocols on a VPS, such as Tuc and Hysteria, speeds can reach over 200 Mbps. Only NaiveProxy's Quic speed is a few hundred kb/s. Therefore, I'm wondering if the speed anomaly is caused by NaiveProxy using Quic.

[klzgrad]

I can reproduce this behavior. QUIC in Naiveproxy is not particularly tuned for performance as TLS is already as fast as possible. But indeed X00 kB/s is a lot slower than before.

[LutongZhu]

我可以重现这个问题。Naiveproxy 中的 QUIC 并没有针对性能进行特别优化，因为 TLS 的速度已经非常快了。但 X00 kB/s 的速度确实比以前慢了很多。

作者您好，是否考虑在quic://模式下进行特别优化