Takeover maintainance of `microaeson`?

[andreasabel]

It seems like stan is the only (direct) user of microaeson.

stan/stan.cabal

Line 165 in 78e4ae1

, microaeson ^>= 0.1.0.0

I am not using microaeson so I should/want not maintain it.

@tomjaguarpaw Would you be willing to take over microaeson?

It has been very little effort to maintain it so far.

[tomjaguarpaw]

Yes, I can "maintain" it in the sense that I can keep it building with new GHC, so that stan still builds, but I won't be able to do any more than that (and it sounds like you're saying that no more is required).

[andreasabel]

Great! Indeed, this is all that is required.

I added you on Hackage and invited you to the repo, and asked to pass Stackage maintainership to you: commercialhaskell/stackage@14e11b8