Replies: 1 comment
-
I was also wondering about this. I don't see any downside in only deploying autoscaled pools with a sensible This point deserves some/more discussion in the current template. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Thanks for this project!
Not clear from docs: Are
agent_nodepools
andautoscaler_nodepools
complementary or distinct? Are they both worker nodepools, where one has CA autoscaling enabled and the other does not? Can I leaveagent_nodepools
empty and put all my nodepools inautoscaler_nodepools
if I want to be able to scale all of them, and just setmin_nodes = 0
andmax_nodes = 0
to not use for now, andmin_nodes = 1
andmax_nodes = 1
to not autoscale a particular pool?Or, do I need to define all the nodepools in
agent_nodepools
and then duplicate them inautoscaler_nodepools
?Please also clarify this in the README and example.tf.
Also, maybe note that agent nodes == worker nodes as someone at some point decided to muddy the waters by introducing both terms.
Another related question:
Why not just have
agent_nodepools
combined, and set autoscaling to true or false on each one, with min/max / count ... or better yet just forget count and have min/max and CA enabled on all by default (maybe this is a resource question)?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions