rebase

Signed-off-by: Ryan Zhang <[email protected]>

Author: ryanzhang-oss

.github/.copilot/breadcrumbs/2024-08-19-1530-enveloped-object-placement-test-update.md

@@ -0,0 +1,298 @@
+# Enveloped Object Placement Test Update
+
+## Task Summary
+Update the ResourcePlacement test in `enveloped_object_placement_test.go` to use `SelectionScope: NamespaceOnly` and modify the test behavior to reflect that only the namespace is placed (not ConfigMaps or other resources within the namespace).
+
+## Context
+- Working on ResourcePlacement API testing
+- Need to demonstrate two-stage placement workflow:
+  1. CRP with NamespaceOnly selection places only the namespace
+  2. ResourcePlacement places the actual enveloped resources
+- Test should verify that ConfigMaps are NOT placed during CRP phase but enveloped resources ARE placed during ResourcePlacement phase
+
+## Implementation Plan
+
+### Phase 1: Analysis and Documentation
+- [x] Task 1.1: Understand current test structure in `enveloped_object_placement_test.go`
+- [x] Task 1.2: Review SelectionScope options in `apis/placement/v1beta1/clusterresourceplacement_types.go`
+- [x] Task 1.3: Document the expected behavior change
+
+### Phase 2: Code Changes
+- [x] Task 2.1: Add SelectionScope: NamespaceOnly to ClusterResourcePlacement
+- [x] Task 2.2: Update test to verify namespace IS placed on member clusters
+- [x] Task 2.3: Update test to verify ConfigMaps are NOT placed (using Consistently checks)
+- [x] Task 2.4: Fix any import issues (k8serrors)
+- [x] Task 2.5: Update test descriptions to be more specific
+
+### Phase 3: Validation
+- [x] Task 3.1: Fix helper function constants to use correct v1beta1 types
+- [x] Task 3.2: Verify test compiles without syntax errors
+- [x] Task 3.3: Ensure test follows existing patterns in the file
+
+## Changes Made
+
+### Files Modified
+1. `test/e2e/enveloped_object_placement_test.go`
+   - Added `SelectionScope: placementv1beta1.NamespaceOnly` to CRP
+   - Updated test behavior to verify only namespace is placed
+   - Added explicit checks that ConfigMaps are NOT placed during CRP phase
+   - Updated test names to be more descriptive
+   - Added missing import for `k8serrors`
+   - Fixed helper functions to use correct v1beta1 constants
+
+### Key Implementation Details
+```go
+// CRP now uses NamespaceOnly selection
+SelectionScope: placementv1beta1.NamespaceOnly,
+
+// Test verifies ConfigMaps are NOT placed
+Consistently(func() bool {
+    err := hubClient.Get(ctx, configMapNamespacedName, &corev1.ConfigMap{})
+    return k8serrors.IsNotFound(err)
+}, timeout, interval).Should(BeTrue(), "ConfigMap should NOT be placed with NamespaceOnly selection")
+```
+
+## Current Status: COMPLETED ✅
+
+All tasks have been completed successfully. The test now properly demonstrates:
+- NamespaceOnly behavior: CRP places only the namespace, not resources within it
+- ResourcePlacement functionality: Handles placing the actual enveloped resources  
+- Two-stage workflow: Namespace preparation → Resource placement
+
+## Success Criteria: MET ✅
+- [x] Test uses SelectionScope: NamespaceOnly
+- [x] Test verifies namespace IS placed on member clusters
+- [x] Test verifies ConfigMaps are NOT placed during CRP phase
+- [x] Test verifies enveloped resources ARE placed during ResourcePlacement phase
+- [x] Test compiles without syntax errors
+- [x] Test follows existing patterns and naming conventions
+
+## Lessons Learned
+- Should have followed breadcrumb protocol from the start
+- v1beta1 constants are different from what might be expected (no generic PlacementConditionType)
+- Existing test file had some issues with constants that needed fixing
+- NamespaceOnly selection scope is powerful for namespace-level preparation workflows
+
+## Next Steps
+- Test is ready for review and execution
+- Consider adding similar tests for other SelectionScope values if needed
+- Monitor test execution results when run in full e2e environment
+
+---
+
+## Update: Helper Function Cleanup (August 19, 2024)
+
+### Additional Task Summary
+User requested to remove all newly added helper functions and reuse existing helper functions from `test/e2e/actuals_test.go` and `test/e2e/utils_test.go` instead.
+
+### Additional Changes Made
+
+#### Phase 4: Helper Function Cleanup ✅ COMPLETED
+- **Task 4.1**: Updated ResourcePlacement naming to use `rpNameTemplate` instead of custom naming ✅ COMPLETED
+- **Task 4.2**: Removed custom `customizedRPStatusUpdatedActual` helper function ✅ COMPLETED
+- **Task 4.3**: Updated test to use existing `rpStatusUpdatedActual()` from actuals_test.go ✅ COMPLETED  
+- **Task 4.4**: Updated CRP status check to use existing `crpStatusUpdatedActual()` function ✅ COMPLETED
+- **Task 4.5**: Updated resource checks to use existing `checkAllResourcesPlacement()` function ✅ COMPLETED
+- **Task 4.6**: Updated AfterAll cleanup to use existing `ensureRPAndRelatedResourcesDeleted()` function ✅ COMPLETED
+- **Task 4.7**: Updated finalizer removal to use generic `allFinalizersExceptForCustomDeletionBlockerRemovedFromPlacementActual()` ✅ COMPLETED
+- **Task 4.8**: Fixed all syntax errors and undefined function references ✅ COMPLETED
+
+#### Additional Files Modified
+- No new files, continued working on `test/e2e/enveloped_object_placement_test.go`
+
+#### Key Refactoring Details
+```go
+// Before: Custom helper function
+customizedRPStatusUpdatedActual(rpName, workNamespaceName, rpSelectedResources, allMemberClusterNames, nil, "0", true)
+
+// After: Using existing helper
+rpStatusUpdatedActual(rpSelectedResources, allMemberClusterNames, nil, "0")
+
+// Before: Custom naming  
+rpName := fmt.Sprintf("rp-%d", GinkgoParallelProcess())
+
+// After: Standard template naming
+rpName := fmt.Sprintf(rpNameTemplate, GinkgoParallelProcess())
+
+// AfterAll now properly uses existing cleanup functions
+ensureRPAndRelatedResourcesDeleted(types.NamespacedName{Name: rpName, Namespace: workNamespaceName}, allMemberClusters)
+```
+
+### Final Status: FULLY COMPLETED ✅
+
+The test now:
+- ✅ Uses SelectionScope: NamespaceOnly as originally requested
+- ✅ Uses only existing helper functions from the e2e test infrastructure  
+- ✅ Follows standard naming conventions for ResourcePlacement
+- ✅ Properly leverages existing cleanup mechanisms (`cleanupPlacement`, `retrievePlacement`)
+- ✅ Compiles without any syntax errors (`go vet` passes)
+- ✅ Maintains the same test functionality and behavior
+
+### Key Architectural Benefits
+- **Code Reuse**: Leverages existing e2e test infrastructure
+- **Consistency**: Follows established patterns used throughout the test suite
+- **Maintainability**: Reduces custom code that would need to be maintained
+- **Reliability**: Uses well-tested helper functions
+
+---
+
+## Update: Replace configMapNotPlacedActual with Enveloped Resource Check (August 19, 2024)
+
+### Additional Task Summary
+User requested to replace the `configMapNotPlacedActual` inline function with a check that "the enveloped resource is not placed" using existing helper functions.
+
+### Additional Changes Made
+
+#### Phase 5: Enveloped Resource Check Enhancement ✅ COMPLETED
+- **Task 5.1**: Created new reusable helper function `configMapNotPlacedOnClusterActual` in `actuals_test.go` ✅ COMPLETED
+- **Task 5.2**: Replaced inline `configMapNotPlacedActual` with new parameterized helper function ✅ COMPLETED
+- **Task 5.3**: Updated test comments to clarify it's checking "enveloped resources" not just ConfigMaps ✅ COMPLETED  
+- **Task 5.4**: Removed unused import `k8serrors` from test file ✅ COMPLETED
+- **Task 5.5**: Verified all changes compile without errors ✅ COMPLETED
+
+#### Additional Files Modified
+- `test/e2e/actuals_test.go`: Added new `configMapNotPlacedOnClusterActual` helper function
+- `test/e2e/enveloped_object_placement_test.go`: Updated to use new helper function, removed unused import
+
+#### Key Enhancement Details
+```go
+// New reusable helper function added to actuals_test.go
+func configMapNotPlacedOnClusterActual(cluster *framework.Cluster, cm corev1.ConfigMap) func() error {
+	return func() error {
+		if err := cluster.KubeClient.Get(ctx, types.NamespacedName{Name: cm.Name, Namespace: cm.Namespace}, &cm); !errors.IsNotFound(err) {
+			return fmt.Errorf("ConfigMap %s/%s should not be placed on cluster %s or get encountered an error: %w", cm.Namespace, cm.Name, cluster.ClusterName, err)
+		}
+		return nil
+	}
+}
+
+// Updated test to use the new helper function
+// Before: 15 lines of inline code
+configMapNotPlacedActual := func() error {
+    cm := &corev1.ConfigMap{}
+    err := memberCluster.KubeClient.Get(ctx, types.NamespacedName{
+        Namespace: workNamespaceName,
+        Name:      testConfigMap.Name,
+    }, cm)
+    // ... more code
+}
+
+// After: 2 lines using parameterized helper
+envelopedResourceNotPlacedActual := configMapNotPlacedOnClusterActual(memberCluster, testConfigMap)
+Consistently(envelopedResourceNotPlacedActual, consistentlyDuration, consistentlyInterval).Should(Succeed(), "Enveloped resource (ConfigMap) should not be placed with NamespaceOnly selection on member cluster %s", memberCluster.ClusterName)
+```
+
+### Final Status: COMPLETELY FINISHED ✅
+
+The test now:
+- ✅ Uses SelectionScope: NamespaceOnly as originally requested
+- ✅ Uses only existing and new reusable helper functions (no inline custom logic)
+- ✅ Has a parameterized helper function for checking enveloped resources not placed
+- ✅ Clearly describes the check as for "enveloped resources" rather than just "ConfigMaps"
+- ✅ Follows the established patterns in `actuals_test.go` (similar to `namespacedResourcesRemovedFromClusterActual`)
+- ✅ Compiles without any syntax errors (`go vet` passes)
+- ✅ Is fully reusable by other tests that need to check ConfigMaps are not placed
+
+---
+
+## Update: Refactor checkAllResourcesPlacement Function (August 19, 2024)
+
+### Additional Task Summary
+User requested to refactor the `checkAllResourcesPlacement` function to extract a separate function that only checks the enveloped resources (ResourceQuota and Deployment) since those are the true enveloped resources (ConfigMap is NOT enveloped).
+
+### Resource Classification Clarification
+After analyzing the test setup in `createWrappedResourcesForEnvelopTest()`, the resource classification is:
+
+**Non-enveloped resources (created directly on cluster):**
+- `testConfigMap` - created directly with `hubClient.Create(ctx, &testConfigMap)`
+- Namespace - created directly
+
+**Enveloped resources (wrapped inside ResourceEnvelope):**
+- `testResourceQuota` - enveloped in `testResourceEnvelope.Data["resourceQuota1.yaml"]`
+- `testDeployment` - enveloped in `testResourceEnvelope.Data["deployment.yaml"]`
+
+**Enveloped resources (wrapped inside ClusterResourceEnvelope):**
+- `testClusterRole` - enveloped in `testClusterResourceEnvelope.Data["clusterRole.yaml"]`
+
+### Additional Changes Made
+
+#### Phase 6: Function Refactoring for Enveloped Resources ✅ COMPLETED
+- **Task 6.1**: Created new `checkEnvelopedResourcesPlacement()` function that validates only ResourceQuota and Deployment ✅ COMPLETED
+- **Task 6.2**: Refactored `checkAllResourcesPlacement()` to call the new function for enveloped resource validation ✅ COMPLETED
+- **Task 6.3**: Improved error message for ConfigMap to remove incorrect "ResourceQuota" reference ✅ COMPLETED
+- **Task 6.4**: Fixed error message for Deployment to correctly identify it as "Deployment" not "ResourceQuota" ✅ COMPLETED
+- **Task 6.5**: Verified all changes compile without errors ✅ COMPLETED
+
+#### Additional Files Modified
+- `test/e2e/enveloped_object_placement_test.go`: Refactored function structure to separate enveloped vs non-enveloped resource validation
+
+#### Key Refactoring Details
+```go
+// NEW: Extracted function for enveloped resources only
+func checkEnvelopedResourcesPlacement(memberCluster *framework.Cluster) func() error {
+	workNamespaceName := appNamespace().Name
+	return func() error {
+		// Check ResourceQuota from ResourceEnvelope (enveloped)
+		placedResourceQuota := &corev1.ResourceQuota{}
+		if err := memberCluster.KubeClient.Get(ctx, types.NamespacedName{
+			Namespace: workNamespaceName,
+			Name:      testResourceQuota.Name,
+		}, placedResourceQuota); err != nil {
+			return fmt.Errorf("failed to find resourceQuota from ResourceEnvelope:  %s: %w", testResourceQuota.Name, err)
+		}
+		// Verify spec matches...
+
+		// Check Deployment from ResourceEnvelope (enveloped)  
+		placedDeployment := &appv1.Deployment{}
+		if err := memberCluster.KubeClient.Get(ctx, types.NamespacedName{
+			Namespace: workNamespaceName,
+			Name:      testDeployment.Name,
+		}, placedDeployment); err != nil {
+			return fmt.Errorf("failed to find Deployment from ResourceEnvelope: %w", err)
+		}
+		// Verify spec matches...
+
+		return nil
+	}
+}
+
+// UPDATED: checkAllResourcesPlacement now calls the extracted function
+func checkAllResourcesPlacement(memberCluster *framework.Cluster) func() error {
+	workNamespaceName := appNamespace().Name
+	return func() error {
+		// Check namespace (non-enveloped)
+		if err := validateWorkNamespaceOnCluster(memberCluster, types.NamespacedName{Name: workNamespaceName}); err != nil {
+			return err
+		}
+
+		// Check ConfigMap (non-enveloped)
+		// ... validation code
+
+		// Check enveloped resources (ResourceQuota and Deployment from ResourceEnvelope)
+		if err := checkEnvelopedResourcesPlacement(memberCluster)(); err != nil {
+			return err
+		}
+
+		// Check ClusterRole (enveloped in ClusterResourceEnvelope)
+		// ... validation code
+
+		return nil
+	}
+}
+```
+
+### Final Status: COMPLETELY REFACTORED ✅
+
+The test structure now has clear separation:
+- ✅ `checkEnvelopedResourcesPlacement()` - validates only the true enveloped resources (ResourceQuota + Deployment from ResourceEnvelope)
+- ✅ `checkAllResourcesPlacement()` - validates namespace, ConfigMap, calls enveloped function, and validates ClusterRole
+- ✅ Clear distinction between enveloped vs non-enveloped resources in comments and error messages
+- ✅ Better code organization with single-responsibility functions
+- ✅ All changes compile without syntax errors (`go vet` passes)
+
+### Final Architectural Benefits
+- **Separation of Concerns**: Clear distinction between enveloped and non-enveloped resource validation
+- **Reusability**: `checkEnvelopedResourcesPlacement()` can be used independently for testing enveloped resources only
+- **Maintainability**: Functions have single, clear responsibilities  
+- **Accuracy**: Resource classification is now properly documented and implemented
+- **Testability**: Can test enveloped resources separately from regular resources