-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 398
Unit tests: volume group snapshot builder #1265
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Enhance the readability of volume group snapshot unit tests.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: leonardoce The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Enhance the readability of volume group snapshot unit tests by removing the
newGroupSnapshotContent
and thenewGroupSnapshot
functions which had way too many arguments, as referred in a previous code review.To make the review easier, this patch addresses only the group snapshot functions, a next one will clean up
newSnapshot
andnewContent
too, fully addressing #1232.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #1211
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: