Skip to content

EFS CSI Stress Tester #1648

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 15 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

EFS CSI Stress Tester #1648

wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

ishaanbhardwaj2003
Copy link

@ishaanbhardwaj2003 ishaanbhardwaj2003 commented Jun 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Is this a bug fix or adding new feature?
Fully modularized CSI Driver Stress Testing Framework.

What is this PR about? / Why do we need it?
This PR restructures the EFS CSI Driver testing framework configuration to make it more modular and maintainable. It splits the monolithic orchestrator_config.yaml into multiple focused component files, making the configuration easier to understand and modify.

What testing is done?

ishaanbhardwaj2003 and others added 11 commits June 5, 2025 21:01
@ishaanbhardwaj2003
Add stress and scalability test framework for EFS CSI Driver
5d38f72
@ishaanbhardwaj2003
Add stress and scalability test framework for EFS CSI Driver
2a86c48
@ishaanbhardwaj2003
Update configuration and run script for stress testing framework
a5cc6e9
@ishaanbhardwaj2003
Move stress-scale-tests from test/e2e/ to test/ directory and improve…
fb33254 
… documentation

- Move stress testing framework to be a peer to e2e tests rather than a subdirectory
- Update scenario names in README.md to be more descriptive
- Add virtual environment setup instructions
- Update credential error message to be more suitable for external users
@ishaanbhardwaj2003
Improve operation interval handling and add detailed failure logging
b4a46e5
@ishaanbhardwaj2003
Refactor testing framework: Modularize code for better maintainability
6c26919
@ishaanbhardwaj2003
Merge branch 'kubernetes-sigs:master' into master
a0d8ddd
@ishaanbhardwaj2003
Add modularized testing framework with enhanced documentation
b725856
@ishaanbhardwaj2003
Remove logs and report files from repository
c503170
@ishaanbhardwaj2003
Add .gitignore to exclude logs, reports, and other unnecessary files
0d42a02
@ishaanbhardwaj2003
Remove Python cache files from repository
6f147a2
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ishaanbhardwaj2003
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mskanth972 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jun 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ishaanbhardwaj2003. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 17, 2025
@ishaanbhardwaj2003 ishaanbhardwaj2003 changed the title Updated tests del Jun 17, 2025
@ishaanbhardwaj2003
Add comprehensive documentation to orchestrator_config.yaml
a2e87b5
@ishaanbhardwaj2003
Add controller crash resilience test to validate CSI driver behavior …
a92bcf1 
…during controller crashes
@ishaanbhardwaj2003
Refactor config into modular component files and add boto3 dependency
47e1a71 
- Split orchestrator_config.yaml into separate component files in config/components/
- Added boto3 to requirements.txt for AWS SDK functionality
- Updated run_tests.py to use component-based configuration
- Enhanced README.md with better documentation and prerequisites
- Improved component configuration clarity with detailed comments
@ishaanbhardwaj2003 ishaanbhardwaj2003 changed the title del EFS CSI Stress Tester Jun 24, 2025
@ishaanbhardwaj2003 ishaanbhardwaj2003 marked this pull request as ready for review June 24, 2025 15:18
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 24, 2025
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dankova22 dankova22 Awaiting requested review from dankova22

@leakingtapan leakingtapan Awaiting requested review from leakingtapan

@Ashley-wenyizha Ashley-wenyizha Awaiting requested review from Ashley-wenyizha

@nckturner nckturner Awaiting requested review from nckturner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@ishaanbhardwaj2003 @k8s-ci-robot @k8s-triage-robot