Skip to content

Commit 8bf9eb0

Browse files
g-gastonneolit123
andcommitted
Clarify CAPI vs CAPI API improvements
Co-authored-by: Lubomir I. Ivanov <[email protected]>
1 parent 376c346 commit 8bf9eb0

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

docs/proposals/20240807-in-place-updates.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ As this proposal is an output of the In-place updates Feature Group, ensuring th
112112

113113
Please note that the practical consequence of focusing on in-place rollout strategies, is that the possibility to implement different types of custom rollout strategies, even if technically possible, won’t be validated in this first iteration (future goal).
114114

115-
Another important point to surface, before digging into implementation details of the proposal, is the fact that this proposal is not tackling the problem of improving CAPI API to embrace all the possibilities that rollout extensions are introducing.
115+
Another important point to surface, before digging into implementation details of the proposal, is the fact that this proposal is not tackling the problem of improving CAPI to embrace all the possibilities that rollout extensions are introducing.
116116

117117
E.g. If a rollout extension introduces support for in-place updates, using “BootstrapConfig” (emphasis on bootstrap) as the place where most of the machine configurations are defined seems not ideal.
118118

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)