test: add suite and initializer tests for conflicting markers analysis

Author: yongruilin

pkg/analysis/conflictingmarkers/conflictingmarkers_suite_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+/*
+Copyright 2025 The Kubernetes Authors.
+
+Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+	http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+limitations under the License.
+*/
+
+package conflictingmarkers_test
+
+import (
+	"testing"
+
+	. "github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2"
+	. "github.com/onsi/gomega"
+)
+
+func TestConflictingMarkers(t *testing.T) {
+	RegisterFailHandler(Fail)
+	RunSpecs(t, "conflictingmarkers")
+}

pkg/analysis/conflictingmarkers/initializer_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+/*
+Copyright 2025 The Kubernetes Authors.
+
+Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+	http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+limitations under the License.
+*/
+
+package conflictingmarkers_test
+
+import (
+	. "github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2"
+	. "github.com/onsi/gomega"
+
+	"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/validation/field"
+	"sigs.k8s.io/kube-api-linter/pkg/analysis/conflictingmarkers"
+	"sigs.k8s.io/kube-api-linter/pkg/analysis/initializer"
+)
+
+var _ = Describe("conflictingmarkers initializer", func() {
+	Context("config validation", func() {
+		type testCase struct {
+			config      conflictingmarkers.ConflictingMarkersConfig
+			expectedErr string
+		}
+
+		DescribeTable("should validate the provided config", func(in testCase) {
+			ci, ok := conflictingmarkers.Initializer().(initializer.ConfigurableAnalyzerInitializer)
+			Expect(ok).To(BeTrue())
+
+			errs := ci.ValidateConfig(&in.config, field.NewPath("conflictingmarkers"))
+			if len(in.expectedErr) > 0 {
+				Expect(errs.ToAggregate()).To(MatchError(in.expectedErr))
+			} else {
+				Expect(errs).To(HaveLen(0), "No errors were expected")
+			}
+		},
+			Entry("With a valid empty config", testCase{
+				config: conflictingmarkers.ConflictingMarkersConfig{
+					CustomConflicts: []conflictingmarkers.ConflictSet{},
+				},
+				expectedErr: "",
+			}),
+			Entry("With a valid custom conflict", testCase{
+				config: conflictingmarkers.ConflictingMarkersConfig{
+					CustomConflicts: []conflictingmarkers.ConflictSet{
+						{
+							Name:        "test_conflict",
+							SetA:        []string{"marker1"},
+							SetB:        []string{"marker2"},
+							Description: "Test conflict",
+						},
+					},
+				},
+				expectedErr: "",
+			}),
+			Entry("With missing name", testCase{
+				config: conflictingmarkers.ConflictingMarkersConfig{
+					CustomConflicts: []conflictingmarkers.ConflictSet{
+						{
+							Name:        "",
+							SetA:        []string{"marker1"},
+							SetB:        []string{"marker2"},
+							Description: "Test conflict",
+						},
+					},
+				},
+				expectedErr: "conflictingmarkers.customConflicts[0].name: Required value: name is required",
+			}),
+			Entry("With overlapping markers", testCase{
+				config: conflictingmarkers.ConflictingMarkersConfig{
+					CustomConflicts: []conflictingmarkers.ConflictSet{
+						{
+							Name:        "test_conflict",
+							SetA:        []string{"marker1", "marker2"},
+							SetB:        []string{"marker2", "marker3"},
+							Description: "Test conflict",
+						},
+					},
+				},
+				expectedErr: "conflictingmarkers.customConflicts[0]: Invalid value: conflictingmarkers.ConflictSet{Name:\"test_conflict\", SetA:[]string{\"marker1\", \"marker2\"}, SetB:[]string{\"marker2\", \"marker3\"}, Description:\"Test conflict\"}: sets cannot contain overlapping markers",
+			}),
+			Entry("With missing description", testCase{
+				config: conflictingmarkers.ConflictingMarkersConfig{
+					CustomConflicts: []conflictingmarkers.ConflictSet{
+						{
+							Name: "test_conflict",
+							SetA: []string{"marker1"},
+							SetB: []string{"marker2"},
+						},
+					},
+				},
+				expectedErr: "conflictingmarkers.customConflicts[0].description: Required value: description is required",
+			}),
+		)
+	})
+})