Skip to content

Commit 74e8a0c

Browse files
committed
Added rules clarification on who is eligible to be nominated for a community award.
Signed-off-by: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
1 parent 9b38b27 commit 74e8a0c

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+3
-2
lines changed

events/awards/playbook.md

Lines changed: 3 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -27,9 +27,10 @@ Here are a few suggestions or ideas that make for a good award nominee:
2727
- Awards are affiliation-free and earned by individuals, we do not mention vendors at all as part of this process
2828
- Vendors are encouraged to celebrate individuals via their own social properties, the awards themselves will remain neutral
2929
- Spread the Wealth
30-
- Should consider lookin at underserved areas of the project
30+
- Should consider looking at underserved areas of the project
3131
- For every "rock star" there's probably a few people quietly doing excellent work.
3232
- Should consider past awards, having the same person winning the award repeatedly shouldn't be the norm.
33+
- As a rule, current SIG Leads, SC members, and other titled community leaders should be considered ineligible for the contributor awards, as their achievements are already recognized.
3334

3435
## Process
3536

@@ -103,4 +104,4 @@ There may be cases where the ceremony is separate or virtual, here are some tips
103104
- Virtual Contributor Summits
104105
- Usually a picture of the award is sufficient and then drop ship the rest.
105106
- Awardees should be made aware of logistics
106-
- The awards are given during the time right up to the end of year holidays, shipping after the holidays is usually easier, awardees should be given a general idea of when the award ships.
107+
- The awards are given during the time right up to the end of year holidays, shipping after the holidays is usually easier, awardees should be given a general idea of when the award ships.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)