@@ -80,9 +80,28 @@ To become a reviewer:
80
80
* Read/study previous PRR comments and production readiness responses in existing KEPs.
81
81
* Choose some KEPs requiring PRR and perform a review. Put "shadow prod readiness review"
82
82
in your review comments so that the assigned PRR approver knows your intent.
83
- * After at least one release cycle, if you have shown good judgement and quality reviews,
84
- you can propose yourself as approver by submitting a PRR to add your GitHub
85
- handle to the ` prod-readiness-approvers ` alias in [ OWNERS_ALIASES] .
83
+
84
+ ### Becoming an approver
85
+
86
+ After serving as reviewer/shadow for at least one release and showing good judgement and quality reviews,
87
+ you can propose yourself as an approver by submitting a PR to add your GitHub
88
+ handle to the ` prod-readiness-approvers ` alias in [ OWNERS_ALIASES] .
89
+
90
+ When submitting the PR, you should include references to KEPs you reviewed that demonstrated a good variety
91
+ of different situations.
92
+ Here is a good starting point (remember that one PR can cover multiple categories):
93
+
94
+ * Transitions from new to alpha
95
+ * Transitions from alpha to beta
96
+ * Transitions from beta to GA
97
+ * Must have successfully reviewed at least three enhancements that require coordination between multiple components.
98
+ * Must have successfully reviewed at least three enhancements that require version skew consideration (both HA and component skew):
99
+ does behavior fail safely and eventually reconcile.
100
+ * Must have successfully reviewed at least three enhancements that are outside your primary domain.
101
+ * Examples where the feature requires considering the case of administering thousands of clusters.
102
+ This comes up frequently for host-based features in storage, node, or networking.
103
+ * Examples where the feature requires considering the case of very large clusters. This is commonly covered by metrics.
104
+
86
105
87
106
## Finding KEPs needing prod readiness review
88
107
0 commit comments