|
4 | 4 |
|
5 | 5 | 1. What work did the SIG do this year that should be highlighted?
|
6 | 6 |
|
7 |
| - - (_to be filled_) |
| 7 | + - Ginkgov2 migration |
| 8 | + - https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/pull/26250 |
| 9 | + - https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/109111 |
| 10 | + - Utilizing context provided by Ginkgo |
| 11 | + - https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/112923 |
| 12 | + - Test failure description improvements |
| 13 | + - https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/113538 |
| 14 | + - Launched prow docs site |
| 15 | + - TestGrid API now available at testgrid-data.k8s.io |
| 16 | + - Prow API service ("Gangway" component) merged, enabling Prow installations to programmatically trigger Prow jobs |
8 | 17 |
|
9 | 18 | 2. What initiatives are you working on that aren't being tracked in KEPs?
|
10 | 19 |
|
11 |
| - - (_to be filled_) |
| 20 | + - Continue to improve testing and enforcing best practices on software development |
| 21 | + - Cost efficiency: |
| 22 | + - Clean up orphan jobs |
| 23 | + - Optimize existing tooling: artifact storage, log size, … |
| 24 | + - Extend the CI to other Cloud Providers |
| 25 | + - Development of a new TestGrid UI |
| 26 | + |
12 | 27 |
|
13 | 28 | 3. KEP work in 2022 (v1.24, v1.25, v1.26):
|
14 | 29 | - beta:
|
|
20 | 35 | 1. What areas and/or subprojects does your group need the most help with?
|
21 | 36 | Any areas with 2 or fewer OWNERs? (link to more details)
|
22 | 37 |
|
23 |
| - - (_to be filled_) |
| 38 | + - Additional reviewers (and eventually approvers) on [Prow](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/tree/master/prow) |
| 39 | + - Many less-active tools in test-infra, such as: |
| 40 | + - [Boskos](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/tree/master/boskos) |
| 41 | + - [Kettle](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/tree/master/kettle) |
| 42 | + - [Kubetest2](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubetest2) |
24 | 43 |
|
25 | 44 | 2. What metrics/community health stats does your group care about and/or measure?
|
26 | 45 |
|
27 | 46 | - Reviewers and approvers
|
28 |
| - - (_any others?_) |
29 | 47 |
|
30 | 48 | 3. Does your [CONTRIBUTING.md] help **new** contributors engage with your group specifically by pointing
|
31 | 49 | to activities or programs that provide useful context or allow easy participation?
|
|
0 commit comments