Skip to content

Commit 9d2e9db

Browse files
committed
KEP-127: Update to latest KEP template
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Campos <[email protected]>
1 parent 914f79b commit 9d2e9db

File tree

1 file changed

+10
-6
lines changed

1 file changed

+10
-6
lines changed

keps/sig-node/127-user-namespaces/README.md

Lines changed: 10 additions & 6 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -7,13 +7,13 @@
77
- [Goals](#goals)
88
- [Non-Goals](#non-goals)
99
- [Proposal](#proposal)
10-
- [User Stories](#user-stories)
10+
- [User Stories (Optional)](#user-stories-optional)
1111
- [Story 1](#story-1)
1212
- [Story 2](#story-2)
1313
- [Story 3](#story-3)
1414
- [Story 4](#story-4)
1515
- [Story 5](#story-5)
16-
- [Notes/Constraints/Caveats](#notesconstraintscaveats)
16+
- [Notes/Constraints/Caveats (Optional)](#notesconstraintscaveats-optional)
1717
- [Risks and Mitigations](#risks-and-mitigations)
1818
- [Design Details](#design-details)
1919
- [Pod.spec changes](#podspec-changes)
@@ -64,10 +64,14 @@ Items marked with (R) are required *prior to targeting to a milestone / release*
6464
- [X] (R) Enhancement issue in release milestone, which links to KEP dir in [kubernetes/enhancements] (not the initial KEP PR)
6565
- [X] (R) KEP approvers have approved the KEP status as `implementable`
6666
- [X] (R) Design details are appropriately documented
67-
- [X] (R) Test plan is in place, giving consideration to SIG Architecture and SIG Testing input
67+
- [X] (R) Test plan is in place, giving consideration to SIG Architecture and SIG Testing input (including test refactors)
68+
- [X] e2e Tests for all Beta API Operations (endpoints)
69+
- [ ] (R) Ensure GA e2e tests meet requirements for [Conformance Tests](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/sig-architecture/conformance-tests.md)
70+
- [ ] (R) Minimum Two Week Window for GA e2e tests to prove flake free
6871
- [X] (R) Graduation criteria is in place
72+
- [ ] (R) [all GA Endpoints](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/1806) must be hit by [Conformance Tests](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/sig-architecture/conformance-tests.md)
6973
- [X] (R) Production readiness review completed
70-
- [X] Production readiness review approved
74+
- [X] (R) Production readiness review approved
7175
- [X] "Implementation History" section is up-to-date for milestone
7276
- [ ] User-facing documentation has been created in [kubernetes/website], for publication to [kubernetes.io]
7377
- [ ] Supporting documentation—e.g., additional design documents, links to mailing list discussions/SIG meetings, relevant PRs/issues, release notes
@@ -156,7 +160,7 @@ This proposal aims to support running pods inside user namespaces.
156160

157161
This mitigates all the vulnerabilities listed in the motivation section.
158162

159-
### User Stories
163+
### User Stories (Optional)
160164

161165
#### Story 1
162166

@@ -190,7 +194,7 @@ As a cluster admin, I want to use different host UIDs/GIDs for pods running on
190194
the same node (whenever kernel/kube features allow it), so I can mitigate the
191195
impact a compromised pod can have on other pods and the node itself.
192196

193-
### Notes/Constraints/Caveats
197+
### Notes/Constraints/Caveats (Optional)
194198

195199
### Risks and Mitigations
196200

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)