You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: keps/sig-api-machinery/1040-priority-and-fairness/README.md
+4-4Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -3013,10 +3013,10 @@ GA:
3013
3013
3014
3014
- [x] API annotations properly support strategic merge patch.
3015
3015
- [x] Design and implement borrowing between priority levels.
3016
-
- [] Satisfaction with LIST and WATCH support.
3017
-
- [] Implement borrowing by exempt priority levels.
3018
-
- [] APF allows us to disable client-side rate limiting without causing the apiservers to wedge/crash. Note that there is another level of concern that APF does not attempt to address, which is mismatch between the throughput that various controllers can sustain.
3019
-
- [] Satisfaction that the interface is sufficient to support tuning of capacity and resource costs.
3016
+
- [x] Satisfaction that LIST and WATCH support are good enough.
3017
+
- [x] Implement borrowing by exempt priority levels.
3018
+
- [x] APF allows us to disable client-side rate limiting without causing the apiservers to wedge/crash. Note that this falls a bit short of saying that we would actually want to disable client-side rate limiting. While experiments show that APF can prevent server crashes, they do not show that the SLOs are met in all scenarios. If the control plane is under-provisioned then the performance will have to suffer in one way or another.
3019
+
- [x] Satisfaction that the interface has sufficient tunability to be useful.
3020
3020
- [ ] Setting `--enable-priority-and-fairness` to `false` disables deeply, including suppressing both the config supplying and config consuming controllers.
0 commit comments