Skip to content

Commit 1f6f75d

Browse files
add blog post to reflect state of podreadytostartcontainerscondition
1 parent 01ac545 commit 1f6f75d

File tree

1 file changed

+62
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+62
-0
lines changed
Lines changed: 62 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
1+
---
2+
layout: blog
3+
title: "Kubernetes 1.29: PodReadyToStartContainers Condition Moves to Beta"
4+
date: 2023-12-19
5+
slug: pod-ready-to-start-containers-condition-now-in-beta
6+
---
7+
8+
**Authors**: Zefeng Chen (independent), Kevin Hannon (Red Hat)
9+
10+
11+
With the recent release of Kubernetes 1.29, the `PodReadyToStartContainers`
12+
[condition](/docs/concepts/workloads/pods/pod-lifecycle/#pod-conditions) is
13+
available by default.
14+
The kubelet manages the value for that condition throughout a Pod's lifecycle,
15+
in the status field of a Pod. The kubelet will use the `PodReadyToStartContainers`
16+
condition to accurately surface the initialization state of a Pod,
17+
from the perspective of Pod sandbox creation and network configuration by a container runtime.
18+
19+
## What's the motivation for this feature?
20+
21+
Cluster administrators did not have a clear and easily accessible way to view the completion of Pod's sandbox creation
22+
and initialization. As of 1.28, the `Initialized` condition in Pods tracks the execution of init containers.
23+
However, it has limitations in accurately reflecting the completion of sandbox creation and readiness to start containers for all Pods in a cluster.
24+
This distinction is particularly important in multi-tenant clusters where tenants own the Pod specifications, including the set of init containers,
25+
while cluster administrators manage storage plugins, networking plugins, and container runtime handlers.
26+
Therefore, there is a need for an improved mechanism to provide cluster administrators with a clear and
27+
comprehensive view of Pod sandbox creation completion and container readiness.
28+
29+
## What's the benefit?
30+
31+
1. Improved Visibility: Cluster administrators gain a clearer and more comprehensive view of Pod sandbox
32+
creation completion and container readiness.
33+
This enhanced visibility allows them to make better-informed decisions and troubleshoot issues more effectively.
34+
2. Metric Collection and Monitoring: Monitoring services can leverage the fields associated with
35+
the `PodReadyToStartContainers` condition to report sandbox creation state and latency.
36+
Metrics can be collected at per-Pod cardinality or aggregated based on various
37+
properties of the Pod, such as `volumes`, `runtimeClassName`, custom annotations for CNI
38+
and IPAM plugins or arbitrary labels and annotations, and `storageClassName` of
39+
PersistentVolumeClaims.
40+
This enables comprehensive monitoring and analysis of Pod readiness across the cluster.
41+
3. Enhanced Troubleshooting: With a more accurate representation of Pod sandbox creation and container readiness,
42+
cluster administrators can quickly identify and address any issues that may arise during the initialization process.
43+
This leads to improved troubleshooting capabilities and reduced downtime.
44+
45+
### What’s next?
46+
47+
Due to feedback and adoption, the Kubernetes team promoted `PodReadyToStartContainersCondition` to Beta in 1.29.
48+
Your comments will help determine if this condition continues forward to get promoted to GA,
49+
so please submit additional feedback on this feature!
50+
51+
### How can I learn more?
52+
53+
Please check out the
54+
[documentation](/docs/concepts/workloads/pods/pod-lifecycle/) for the
55+
`PodReadyToStartContainersCondition` to learn more about it and how it fits in relation to
56+
other Pod conditions.
57+
58+
### How to get involved?
59+
60+
This feature is driven by the SIG Node community. Please join us to connect with
61+
the community and share your ideas and feedback around the above feature and
62+
beyond. We look forward to hearing from you!

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)