Skip to content

Commit 329af06

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #42085 from AlexanderSerbul/patch-1
Update connect-applications-service.md
2 parents 5f4fa22 + 9ad322d commit 329af06

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

content/en/docs/tutorials/services/connect-applications-service.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ to make queries against both IPs. Note that the containers are *not* using port
5959
the node, nor are there any special NAT rules to route traffic to the pod. This means
6060
you can run multiple nginx pods on the same node all using the same `containerPort`,
6161
and access them from any other pod or node in your cluster using the assigned IP
62-
address for the Service. If you want to arrange for a specific port on the host
62+
address for the pod. If you want to arrange for a specific port on the host
6363
Node to be forwarded to backing Pods, you can - but the networking model should
6464
mean that you do not need to do so.
6565
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ Note there's no mention of your Service. This is because you created the replica
189189
before the Service. Another disadvantage of doing this is that the scheduler might
190190
put both Pods on the same machine, which will take your entire Service down if
191191
it dies. We can do this the right way by killing the 2 Pods and waiting for the
192-
Deployment to recreate them. This time around the Service exists *before* the
192+
Deployment to recreate them. This time the Service exists *before* the
193193
replicas. This will give you scheduler-level Service spreading of your Pods
194194
(provided all your nodes have equal capacity), as well as the right environment
195195
variables:

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)