Skip to content

Commit 49d4fc6

Browse files
committed
Translation blog Weekly-Kubernetes-Community-Hangout
1 parent e79aa8d commit 49d4fc6

File tree

1 file changed

+190
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+190
-0
lines changed
Lines changed: 190 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
1+
<!--
2+
---
3+
title: " Weekly Kubernetes Community Hangout Notes - July 31 2015 "
4+
date: 2015-08-04
5+
slug: weekly-kubernetes-community-hangout
6+
url: /blog/2015/08/Weekly-Kubernetes-Community-Hangout
7+
---
8+
-->
9+
10+
---
11+
title: " Kubernetes社区每周环聊笔记-2015年7月31日 "
12+
date: 2015-08-04
13+
slug: weekly-kubernetes-community-hangout
14+
url: /blog/2015/08/Weekly-Kubernetes-Community-Hangout
15+
---
16+
17+
<!--
18+
Every week the Kubernetes contributing community meet virtually over Google Hangouts. We want anyone who's interested to know what's discussed in this forum.
19+
20+
Here are the notes from today's meeting:
21+
-->
22+
23+
每周,Kubernetes 贡献社区都会通过Google 环聊虚拟开会。我们希望任何有兴趣的人都知道本论坛讨论的内容。
24+
25+
这是今天会议的笔记:
26+
27+
<!--
28+
* Private Registry Demo - Muhammed
29+
30+
* Run docker-registry as an RC/Pod/Service
31+
32+
* Run a proxy on every node
33+
34+
* Access as localhost:5000
35+
36+
* Discussion:
37+
38+
* Should we back it by GCS or S3 when possible?
39+
40+
* Run real registry backed by $object_store on each node
41+
42+
* DNS instead of localhost?
43+
44+
* disassemble image strings?
45+
46+
* more like DNS policy?
47+
-->
48+
* 私人注册表演示 - Muhammed
49+
50+
* 将 docker-registry 作为 RC/Pod/Service 运行
51+
52+
* 在每个节点上运行代理
53+
54+
* 以 localhost:5000 访问
55+
56+
* 讨论:
57+
58+
* 我们应该在可能的情况下通过 GCS 或 S3 支持它吗?
59+
60+
* 在每个节点上运行由 $object_store 支持的真实注册表
61+
62+
* DNS 代替 localhost?
63+
64+
* 分解图像字符串?
65+
66+
* 更像 DNS 策略吗?
67+
<!--
68+
* Running Large Clusters - Joe
69+
70+
* Samsung keen to see large scale O(1000)
71+
72+
* Starting on AWS
73+
74+
* RH also interested - test plan needed
75+
76+
* Plan for next week: discuss working-groups
77+
78+
* If you are interested in joining conversation on cluster scalability send mail to [[email protected]][4]
79+
-->
80+
81+
* 运行大型集群 - Joe
82+
83+
* 三星渴望看到大规模 O(1000)
84+
85+
* 从AWS开始
86+
87+
* RH也有兴趣 - 需要测试计划
88+
89+
* 计划下周:讨论工作组
90+
91+
* 如果您有兴趣加入有关集群可扩展性的对话,请发送邮件至[[email protected]][4]
92+
93+
<!--
94+
* Resource API Proposal - Clayton
95+
96+
* New stuff wants more info on resources
97+
98+
* Proposal for resources API - ask apiserver for info on pods
99+
100+
* Send feedback to: #11951
101+
102+
* Discussion on snapshot vs time-series vs aggregates
103+
-->
104+
105+
* 资源 API 提案 - Clayton
106+
107+
* 新东西需要更多资源信息
108+
109+
* 关于资源 API 的提案 - 向 apiserver 询问有关pod的信息
110+
111+
* 发送反馈至:#11951
112+
113+
* 关于快照,时间序列和聚合的讨论
114+
115+
<!--
116+
* Containerized kubelet - Clayton
117+
118+
* Open pull
119+
120+
* Docker mount propagation - RH carries patches
121+
122+
* Big issues around whole bootstrap of the system
123+
124+
* dual: boot-docker/system-docker
125+
126+
* Kube-in-docker is really nice, but maybe not critical
127+
128+
* Do the small stuff to make progress
129+
130+
* Keep pressure on docker
131+
-->
132+
* 容器化 kubelet - Clayton
133+
134+
* 打开 pull
135+
136+
* Docker挂载传播 - RH 带有补丁
137+
138+
* 有关整个系统引导程序的大问题
139+
140+
* 双:引导docker /系统docker
141+
142+
* Kube-in-docker非常好,但可能并不关键
143+
144+
* 做些小事以取得进步
145+
146+
* 对 docker 施加压力
147+
<!--
148+
* Web UI (preilly)
149+
150+
* Where does web UI stand?
151+
152+
* OK to split it back out
153+
154+
* Use it as a container image
155+
156+
* Build image as part of kube release process
157+
158+
* Vendor it back in? Maybe, maybe not.
159+
160+
* Will DNS be split out?
161+
162+
* Probably more tightly integrated, instead
163+
164+
* Other potential spin-outs:
165+
166+
* apiserver
167+
168+
* clients
169+
-->
170+
* Web UI(普通用户)
171+
172+
* Web UI 放在哪里?
173+
174+
* 确定将其拆分出去
175+
176+
* 将其用作容器图像
177+
178+
* 作为 kube 发布过程的一部分构建映像
179+
180+
* vendor回来了吗?也许吧,也许不是。
181+
182+
* DNS将被拆分吗?
183+
184+
* 可能更紧密地集成在一起,而不是
185+
186+
* 其他潜在的衍生产品:
187+
188+
* apiserver
189+
190+
* clients

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)