[en] fix wrong link

Signed-off-by: xin.li <[email protected]>

Author: my-git9

content/en/blog/_posts/2021-04-19-introducing-indexed-jobs.md

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ spec:
 Note that completion mode is an alpha feature in the 1.21 release. To be able to
 use it in your cluster, make sure to enable the `IndexedJob` [feature
 gate](/docs/reference/command-line-tools-reference/feature-gates/) on the
-[API server](docs/reference/command-line-tools-reference/kube-apiserver/) and
+[API server](/docs/reference/command-line-tools-reference/kube-apiserver/) and
 the [controller manager](/docs/reference/command-line-tools-reference/kube-controller-manager/).
 
 When you run the example, you will see that each of the three created Pods gets a

content/en/blog/_posts/2022-05-03-dockershim-historical-context.md

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The [Container Runtime Interface](/blog/2016/12/container-runtime-interface-cri-
 
 However, this little software shim was never intended to be a permanent solution. Over the course of years, its existence has introduced a lot of unnecessary complexity to the kubelet itself. Some integrations are inconsistently implemented for Docker because of this shim, resulting in an increased burden on maintainers, and maintaining vendor-specific code is not in line with our open source philosophy. To reduce this maintenance burden and move towards a more collaborative community in support of open standards, [KEP-2221 was introduced](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-node/2221-remove-dockershim), proposing the removal of the dockershim. With the release of Kubernetes v1.20, the deprecation was official.
 
-We didn’t do a great job communicating this, and unfortunately, the deprecation announcement led to some panic within the community. Confusion around what this meant for Docker as a company, if container images built by Docker would still run, and what Docker Engine actually is led to a conflagration on social media. This was our fault; we should have more clearly communicated what was happening and why at the time. To combat this, we released [a blog](/blog/2020/12/02/dont-panic-kubernetes-and-docker/) and [accompanying FAQ](/blog/2020/12/02/dockershim-faq/) to allay the community’s fears and correct some misconceptions about what Docker is and how containers work within Kubernetes. As a result of the community’s concerns, Docker and Mirantis jointly agreed to continue supporting the dockershim code in the form of [cri-dockerd](https://www.mirantis.com/blog/the-future-of-dockershim-is-cri-dockerd/), allowing you to continue using Docker Engine as your container runtime if need be. For the interest of users who want to try other runtimes, like containerd or cri-o, [migration documentation was written](docs/tasks/administer-cluster/migrating-from-dockershim/change-runtime-containerd/).
+We didn’t do a great job communicating this, and unfortunately, the deprecation announcement led to some panic within the community. Confusion around what this meant for Docker as a company, if container images built by Docker would still run, and what Docker Engine actually is led to a conflagration on social media. This was our fault; we should have more clearly communicated what was happening and why at the time. To combat this, we released [a blog](/blog/2020/12/02/dont-panic-kubernetes-and-docker/) and [accompanying FAQ](/blog/2020/12/02/dockershim-faq/) to allay the community’s fears and correct some misconceptions about what Docker is and how containers work within Kubernetes. As a result of the community’s concerns, Docker and Mirantis jointly agreed to continue supporting the dockershim code in the form of [cri-dockerd](https://www.mirantis.com/blog/the-future-of-dockershim-is-cri-dockerd/), allowing you to continue using Docker Engine as your container runtime if need be. For the interest of users who want to try other runtimes, like containerd or cri-o, [migration documentation was written](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/migrating-from-dockershim/change-runtime-containerd/).
 
 We later [surveyed the community](https://kubernetes.io/blog/2021/11/12/are-you-ready-for-dockershim-removal/) and [discovered that there are still many users with questions and concerns](/blog/2022/01/07/kubernetes-is-moving-on-from-dockershim). In response, Kubernetes maintainers and the CNCF committed to addressing these concerns by extending documentation and other programs. In fact, this blog post is a part of this program. With so many end users successfully migrated to other runtimes, and improved documentation, we believe that everyone has a paved way to migration now.