|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +layout: blog |
| 3 | +title: 'Kubernetes 1.31:podAffinity 中的 matchLabelKeys 进阶至 Beta' |
| 4 | +date: 2024-08-16 |
| 5 | +slug: matchlabelkeys-podaffinity |
| 6 | +author: > |
| 7 | + Kensei Nakada (Tetrate) |
| 8 | +--- |
| 9 | +<!-- |
| 10 | +layout: blog |
| 11 | +title: 'Kubernetes 1.31: MatchLabelKeys in PodAffinity graduates to beta' |
| 12 | +date: 2024-08-16 |
| 13 | +slug: matchlabelkeys-podaffinity |
| 14 | +author: > |
| 15 | + Kensei Nakada (Tetrate) |
| 16 | +--> |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +<!-- |
| 19 | +Kubernetes 1.29 introduced new fields `MatchLabelKeys` and `MismatchLabelKeys` in PodAffinity and PodAntiAffinity. |
| 20 | +
|
| 21 | +In Kubernetes 1.31, this feature moves to beta and the corresponding feature gate (`MatchLabelKeysInPodAffinity`) gets enabled by default. |
| 22 | +--> |
| 23 | +Kubernetes 1.29 在 podAffinity 和 podAntiAffinity 中引入了新的字段 `matchLabelKeys` 和 `mismatchLabelKeys`。 |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +在 Kubernetes 1.31 中,此特性进阶至 Beta,并且相应的特性门控(`MatchLabelKeysInPodAffinity`)默认启用。 |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +<!-- |
| 28 | +## `MatchLabelKeys` - Enhanced scheduling for versatile rolling updates |
| 29 | +
|
| 30 | +During a workload's (e.g., Deployment) rolling update, a cluster may have Pods from multiple versions at the same time. |
| 31 | +However, the scheduler cannot distinguish between old and new versions based on the `LabelSelector` specified in PodAffinity or PodAntiAffinity. As a result, it will co-locate or disperse Pods regardless of their versions. |
| 32 | +--> |
| 33 | +## `matchLabelKeys` - 为多样化滚动更新增强了调度 |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +在工作负载(例如 Deployment)的滚动更新期间,集群中可能同时存在多个版本的 Pod。 |
| 36 | +然而,调度器无法基于 podAffinity 或 podAntiAffinity 中指定的 `labelSelector` 区分新旧版本。 |
| 37 | +结果,调度器将并置或分散调度 Pod,不会考虑这些 Pod 的版本。 |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +<!-- |
| 40 | +This can lead to sub-optimal scheduling outcome, for example: |
| 41 | +- New version Pods are co-located with old version Pods (PodAffinity), which will eventually be removed after rolling updates. |
| 42 | +- Old version Pods are distributed across all available topologies, preventing new version Pods from finding nodes due to PodAntiAffinity. |
| 43 | +--> |
| 44 | +这可能导致次优的调度结果,例如: |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +- 新版本的 Pod 与旧版本的 Pod(podAffinity)并置在一起,这些旧版本的 Pod 最终将在滚动更新后被移除。 |
| 47 | +- 旧版本的 Pod 被分布在所有可用的拓扑中,导致新版本的 Pod 由于 podAntiAffinity 无法找到节点。 |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +<!-- |
| 50 | +`MatchLabelKeys` is a set of Pod label keys and addresses this problem. |
| 51 | +The scheduler looks up the values of these keys from the new Pod's labels and combines them with `LabelSelector` |
| 52 | +so that PodAffinity matches Pods that have the same key-value in labels. |
| 53 | +
|
| 54 | +By using label [pod-template-hash](/docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/deployment/#pod-template-hash-label) in `MatchLabelKeys`, |
| 55 | +you can ensure that only Pods of the same version are evaluated for PodAffinity or PodAntiAffinity. |
| 56 | +--> |
| 57 | +`matchLabelKeys` 是一组 Pod 标签键,可以解决上述问题。 |
| 58 | +调度器从新 Pod 的标签中查找这些键的值,并将其与 `labelSelector` 结合, |
| 59 | +以便 podAffinity 匹配到具有相同标签键值的 Pod。 |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +通过在 `matchLabelKeys` 中使用标签 |
| 62 | +[pod-template-hash](/zh-cn/docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/deployment/#pod-template-hash-label), |
| 63 | +你可以确保对 podAffinity 或 podAntiAffinity 进行评估时仅考虑相同版本的 Pod。 |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +```yaml |
| 66 | +apiVersion: apps/v1 |
| 67 | +kind: Deployment |
| 68 | +metadata: |
| 69 | + name: application-server |
| 70 | +... |
| 71 | + affinity: |
| 72 | + podAffinity: |
| 73 | + requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: |
| 74 | + - labelSelector: |
| 75 | + matchExpressions: |
| 76 | + - key: app |
| 77 | + operator: In |
| 78 | + values: |
| 79 | + - database |
| 80 | + topologyKey: topology.kubernetes.io/zone |
| 81 | + matchLabelKeys: |
| 82 | + - pod-template-hash |
| 83 | +``` |
| 84 | +
|
| 85 | +<!-- |
| 86 | +The above matchLabelKeys will be translated in Pods like: |
| 87 | +--> |
| 88 | +上述 Pod 中的 `matchLabelKeys` 将被转换为: |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +<!-- |
| 91 | +# Added from matchLabelKeys; Only Pods from the same replicaset will match this affinity. |
| 92 | +--> |
| 93 | +```yaml |
| 94 | +kind: Pod |
| 95 | +metadata: |
| 96 | + name: application-server |
| 97 | + labels: |
| 98 | + pod-template-hash: xyz |
| 99 | +... |
| 100 | + affinity: |
| 101 | + podAffinity: |
| 102 | + requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: |
| 103 | + - labelSelector: |
| 104 | + matchExpressions: |
| 105 | + - key: app |
| 106 | + operator: In |
| 107 | + values: |
| 108 | + - database |
| 109 | + - key: pod-template-hash # 从 matchLabelKeys 添加; 只有来自同一 ReplicaSet 的 Pod 将与此亲和性匹配 |
| 110 | + operator: In |
| 111 | + values: |
| 112 | + - xyz |
| 113 | + topologyKey: topology.kubernetes.io/zone |
| 114 | + matchLabelKeys: |
| 115 | + - pod-template-hash |
| 116 | +``` |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | +<!-- |
| 119 | +## `MismatchLabelKeys` - Service isolation |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +`MismatchLabelKeys` is a set of Pod label keys, like `MatchLabelKeys`, |
| 122 | +which looks up the values of these keys from the new Pod's labels, and merge them with `LabelSelector` as `key notin (value)` |
| 123 | +so that PodAffinity does _not_ match Pods that have the same key-value in labels. |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +Suppose all Pods for each tenant get `tenant` label via a controller or a manifest management tool like Helm. |
| 126 | +--> |
| 127 | +## `mismatchLabelKeys` - 服务隔离 |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +`mismatchLabelKeys` 是一组 Pod 标签键,类似于 `matchLabelKeys`, |
| 130 | +它在新 Pod 的标签中查找这些键的值,并将其与 `labelSelector` 合并为 `key notin (value)`, |
| 131 | +以便 podAffinity **不**会匹配到具有相同标签键值的 Pod。 |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +假设每个租户的所有 Pod 通过控制器或像 Helm 这样的清单管理工具得到 `tenant` 标签。 |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +<!-- |
| 136 | +Although the value of `tenant` label is unknown when composing each workload's manifest, |
| 137 | +the cluster admin wants to achieve exclusive 1:1 tenant to domain placement for a tenant isolation. |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +`MismatchLabelKeys` works for this usecase; |
| 140 | +By applying the following affinity globally using a mutating webhook, |
| 141 | +the cluster admin can ensure that the Pods from the same tenant will land on the same domain exclusively, |
| 142 | +meaning Pods from other tenants won't land on the same domain. |
| 143 | +--> |
| 144 | +尽管在组合每个工作负载的清单时,`tenant` 标签的值是未知的, |
| 145 | +但集群管理员希望实现租户与域之间形成排他性的 1:1 对应关系,以便隔离租户。 |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +`mismatchLabelKeys` 适用于这一使用场景; |
| 148 | +通过使用变更性质的 Webhook 在全局应用以下亲和性, |
| 149 | +集群管理员可以确保来自同一租户的 Pod 将以独占方式落到同一域上, |
| 150 | +这意味着来自其他租户的 Pod 不会落到同一域上。 |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +<!-- |
| 153 | +# ensures the pods of this tenant land on the same node pool |
| 154 | +# ensures only Pods from this tenant lands on the same node pool |
| 155 | +--> |
| 156 | +```yaml |
| 157 | +affinity: |
| 158 | + podAffinity: # 确保此租户的 Pod 落在同一节点池上 |
| 159 | + requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: |
| 160 | + - matchLabelKeys: |
| 161 | + - tenant |
| 162 | + topologyKey: node-pool |
| 163 | + podAntiAffinity: # 确保只有此租户的 Pod 落在同一节点池上 |
| 164 | + requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: |
| 165 | + - mismatchLabelKeys: |
| 166 | + - tenant |
| 167 | + labelSelector: |
| 168 | + matchExpressions: |
| 169 | + - key: tenant |
| 170 | + operator: Exists |
| 171 | + topologyKey: node-pool |
| 172 | +``` |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | +<!-- |
| 175 | +The above matchLabelKeys and mismatchLabelKeys will be translated to like: |
| 176 | +--> |
| 177 | +上述的 `matchLabelKeys` 和 `mismatchLabelKeys` 将被转换为: |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +<!-- |
| 180 | +# ensures the pods of this tenant land on the same node pool |
| 181 | +# ensures only Pods from this tenant lands on the same node pool |
| 182 | +--> |
| 183 | +```yaml |
| 184 | +kind: Pod |
| 185 | +metadata: |
| 186 | + name: application-server |
| 187 | + labels: |
| 188 | + tenant: service-a |
| 189 | +spec: |
| 190 | + affinity: |
| 191 | + podAffinity: # 确保此租户的 Pod 落在同一节点池上 |
| 192 | + requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: |
| 193 | + - matchLabelKeys: |
| 194 | + - tenant |
| 195 | + topologyKey: node-pool |
| 196 | + labelSelector: |
| 197 | + matchExpressions: |
| 198 | + - key: tenant |
| 199 | + operator: In |
| 200 | + values: |
| 201 | + - service-a |
| 202 | + podAntiAffinity: # 确保只有此租户的 Pod 落在同一节点池上 |
| 203 | + requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: |
| 204 | + - mismatchLabelKeys: |
| 205 | + - tenant |
| 206 | + labelSelector: |
| 207 | + matchExpressions: |
| 208 | + - key: tenant |
| 209 | + operator: Exists |
| 210 | + - key: tenant |
| 211 | + operator: NotIn |
| 212 | + values: |
| 213 | + - service-a |
| 214 | + topologyKey: node-pool |
| 215 | +``` |
| 216 | + |
| 217 | +<!-- |
| 218 | +## Getting involved |
| 219 | + |
| 220 | +These features are managed by Kubernetes [SIG Scheduling](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/tree/master/sig-scheduling). |
| 221 | + |
| 222 | +Please join us and share your feedback. We look forward to hearing from you! |
| 223 | +--> |
| 224 | +## 参与其中 |
| 225 | + |
| 226 | +这些特性由 Kubernetes |
| 227 | +[SIG Scheduling](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/tree/master/sig-scheduling) 管理。 |
| 228 | + |
| 229 | +请加入我们并分享你的反馈。我们期待听到你的声音! |
| 230 | + |
| 231 | +<!-- |
| 232 | +## How can I learn more? |
| 233 | + |
| 234 | +- [The official document of PodAffinity](/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/assign-pod-node/#inter-pod-affinity-and-anti-affinity) |
| 235 | +- [KEP-3633: Introduce MatchLabelKeys and MismatchLabelKeys to PodAffinity and PodAntiAffinity](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-scheduling/3633-matchlabelkeys-to-podaffinity/README.md#story-2) |
| 236 | +--> |
| 237 | +## 了解更多 |
| 238 | + |
| 239 | +- [podAffinity 的官方文档](/zh-cn/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/assign-pod-node/#inter-pod-affinity-and-anti-affinity) |
| 240 | +- [KEP-3633:将 matchLabelKeys 和 mismatchLabelKeys 引入 podAffinity 和 podAntiAffinity](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-scheduling/3633-matchlabelkeys-to-podaffinity/README.md#story-2) |
0 commit comments