Skip to content

Commit 9151b93

Browse files
committed
Add the link of supposed example in topology-spread-constraints.md
1 parent b6f29ff commit 9151b93

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

content/en/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/topology-spread-constraints.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -480,8 +480,8 @@ There are some implicit conventions worth noting here:
480480
- The scheduler bypasses any nodes that don't have any `topologySpreadConstraints[*].topologyKey`
481481
present. This implies that:
482482

483-
1. any Pods located on those bypassed nodes do not impact `maxSkew` calculation - in the
484-
above example, suppose the node `node1` does not have a label "zone", then the 2 Pods will
483+
1. any Pods located on those bypassed nodes do not impact `maxSkew` calculation - [in the
484+
above example](#example-conflicting-topologyspreadconstraints), suppose the node `node1` does not have a label "zone", then the 2 Pods will
485485
be disregarded, hence the incoming Pod will be scheduled into zone `A`.
486486
2. the incoming Pod has no chances to be scheduled onto this kind of nodes -
487487
in the above example, suppose a node `node5` has the **mistyped** label `zone-typo: zoneC`

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)