Skip to content

Commit c7441cd

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #24544 from willseeyou/patch-2
fix typo in concepts/services-networking/dns-pod-service.md
2 parents 3ca8374 + ad13389 commit c7441cd

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

content/en/docs/concepts/services-networking/dns-pod-service.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ When you set `setHostnameAsFQDN: true` in the Pod spec, the kubelet writes the P
181181
{{< note >}}
182182
In Linux, the hostname field of the kernel (the `nodename` field of `struct utsname`) is limited to 64 characters.
183183

184-
If a Pod enables this feature and its FQDN is longer than 64 character, it will fail to start. The Pod will remain in `Pending` status (`ContainerCreating` as seen by `kubectl`) generating error events, such as Failed to construct FQDN from pod hostname and cluster domain, FQDN `long-FDQN` is too long (64 characters is the max, 70 characters requested). One way of improving user experience for this scenario is to create an [admission webhook controller](/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/extensible-admission-controllers/#admission-webhooks) to control FQDN size when users create top level objects, for example, Deployment.
184+
If a Pod enables this feature and its FQDN is longer than 64 character, it will fail to start. The Pod will remain in `Pending` status (`ContainerCreating` as seen by `kubectl`) generating error events, such as Failed to construct FQDN from pod hostname and cluster domain, FQDN `long-FQDN` is too long (64 characters is the max, 70 characters requested). One way of improving user experience for this scenario is to create an [admission webhook controller](/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/extensible-admission-controllers/#admission-webhooks) to control FQDN size when users create top level objects, for example, Deployment.
185185
{{< /note >}}
186186

187187
### Pod's DNS Policy

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)