Update content/en/blog/_posts/2023-01-15-Security-Bahavior-Analysis/index.md

Co-authored-by: Nate W. <[email protected]>

Author: davidhadas

content/en/blog/_posts/2023-01-15-Security-Bahavior-Analysis/index.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ David Hadas (IBM Research Labs)
 
 _This post warns Devops from a false sense of security. Following security best practices when developing and configuring microservices do not result in non-vulnerable microservices. The post shows that although all deployed microservices are vulnerable, there is much that can be done to ensure microservices are not exploited. It explains how analyzing the behavior of clients and services from a security standpoint, named here **"Security-Behavior Analysis"**, can protect the deployed vulnerable microservices. It points to [Guard](http://knative.dev/security-guard), an open source project offering security-behavior monitoring and control of Kubernetes microservices presumed vulnerable._
 
-As cyber attacks continue to intensify in sophistication, organizations deploying cloud services, continue to grow their cyber investments aiming to produce safe and non-vulnerable services. However, the year-by-year growth in cyber investments, does not result in a parallel reduction in cyber incidents. Instead, the number of cyber incidents continues to grow annually. Evidently organizations are doomed to fail at this struggle - no matter how much effort is made to detect and remove cyber weaknesses from deployed services, it seems offenders always have the upper hand.
+As cyber attacks continue to intensify in sophistication, organizations deploying cloud services continue to grow their cyber investments aiming to produce safe and non-vulnerable services. However, the year-by-year growth in cyber investments does not result in a parallel reduction in cyber incidents. Instead, the number of cyber incidents continues to grow annually. Evidently, organizations are doomed to fail in this struggle - no matter how much effort is made to detect and remove cyber weaknesses from deployed services, it seems offenders always have the upper hand.
 
 Considering the current spread of offensive tools, sophistication of offensive players, and ever-growing cyber financial gains to offenders, any cyber strategy that relies on constructing a non-vulnerable, weakness-free service in 2023 is clearly too naïve. It seems the only viable strategy is to: