Stricter Type Handling in LCEL Provided by langchain-core #24591
CastaChick
announced in
Ideas
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Checked
Feature request
Stricter Type Handling in LCEL Provided by langchain-core
The pipe operator-based chaining of Runnables defined in LCEL is highly convenient; however, its type leniency poses challenges for production use. I recommend enforcing stricter type definitions for the arguments in the
__or__
,__ror__
, andpipe
functions withinlibs/core/langchain_core/runnables/base.py
to enhance type consistency.While this change could be breaking for some existing chains that currently work without type consistency, it is a necessary step for ensuring the safety and reliability of generative AI products in production environments.
Motivation
The current implementation permits chains that fail to function correctly with inputs due to type inconsistencies. For instance, the following chain does not raise a type error despite the inconsistency:
In contrast,
langchain-js
on TypeScript identifies such issues at compile time, as demonstrated below:The absence of strict type enforcement in LCEL complicates its use in production environments, where ensuring type safety is essential for stability and reliability. Modern Python development relies heavily on type checking tools such as
mypy
and plugins of IDEs to identify type inconsistencies in real-time, thereby enhancing code quality and maintainability.Proposal (If applicable)
libs/core/langchain_core/runnables/base.py
hereeg:
__or__
ref: The type definition of
langchain-js
is belowBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions