You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I searched existing ideas and did not find a similar one
I added a very descriptive title
I've clearly described the feature request and motivation for it
Feature request
Please add kwargs in Runnable.invoke. It is in ainvoke, stream, astream, batch, abatch, transform and atransform. It is even in RunnableSequence.invoke. It doesn't make sense that it isn't included in the base invoke method, and it is leading to warnings in the code editor when chaining and calling invoke because the resulting return type from or and ror is RunnableSerializable. Please include it in the signature.
Motivation
Runnable.invoke should have kwargs like the other methods, and like in RunnableSequence.invoke. There are warnings in the code editor when chaining and calling invoke because the resulting return type from or and ror is RunnableSerializable.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Checked
Feature request
Please add kwargs in Runnable.invoke. It is in ainvoke, stream, astream, batch, abatch, transform and atransform. It is even in RunnableSequence.invoke. It doesn't make sense that it isn't included in the base invoke method, and it is leading to warnings in the code editor when chaining and calling invoke because the resulting return type from or and ror is RunnableSerializable. Please include it in the signature.
Motivation
Runnable.invoke should have kwargs like the other methods, and like in RunnableSequence.invoke. There are warnings in the code editor when chaining and calling invoke because the resulting return type from or and ror is RunnableSerializable.
Proposal (If applicable)
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions