Replies: 1 comment
-
We'll take this under consideration; it's definitely not out of the question (removing the dependency, not really inverting the dep or mving all the runnable definitions here) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I don't like that I have to install Langchain Core when using LangGraph. It seems completely backward that langgraph has a dependency on langchain core and not the other way around. LangGraph is the core. I suggest moving all the core runnables to LangGraph, and remove the langchain dependency from langgraph, and add a dependency to LangGraph in Langchain Core. For backward compatibility, keep the imports in the langchain_core.runnable package, where you'll be importing from langgraph.runnable. This won't break anything.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions