You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
We are using morph relationships in multiple tables, some of which have a few million rows.
In the
QueriesRelationships
trait, this snippet in thehasMorph
function has brough our database to its knees:Of course we could add more indexes, but it would be nice if there was an alternative where the distinct
morphTypes
could be defined in the model.Thoughts?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions