Lite paper faq (#105)

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Maciej Kula <[email protected]>

* wip

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Maciej Kula <[email protected]>

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Maciej Kula <[email protected]>

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

* wip

---------

Co-authored-by: Maciej Kula <[email protected]>

Author: MichaelTrestman

docs/research/synchronized-halving.md

@@ -4,11 +4,13 @@ title: "Token Halvings Problem and Solution"
 
 # Token Halvings Problem and Solution
 
+Authors: [Maciej Kula](https://github.com/mcjkula), [Michael Trestman](https://github.com/MichaelTrestman) and [Spacetime_tao](https://x.com/Spacetime_tao)
+
 This page explains the motivation for synchronizing ALPHA [emission](#emission) halvings with the global [TAO](#tao-τ) halving schedule, in plain language without requiring any math. 
 
 In Bittensor's Dynamic TAO (dTAO) system, each [subnet](../resources/glossary.md#subnet) has its own token, referred to as its ALPHA (α), which represents [stake](../resources/glossary.md#stake) in the subnet and powers commodity validation according to [Yuma Consensus](../learn/yuma-consensus). While this creates a powerful market-driven allocation system, the current design uses independent halving schedules that create unintended asymmetries over time, disadvantaging later subnet cohorts.
 
-For formal derivations, see the [white paper](https://github.com/mcjkula/papers/blob/main/dtao-halving-synchronization-2025-v1.pdf).
+For formal derivations, see the [white paper](https://github.com/mcjkula/papers/blob/main/dtao-halving-synchronization-2025-v1.pdf) by Maciej Kula.
 
 See also: [Token Halvings Problem and Solution: Frequently asked questions (FAQ)](./halvings-problem.md).