Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
actually, I think something even better than just support "async function", would be to have this package work as a dependency instead of a decorator, since it would allow us to get all advantages of fastapi's dependency injection system. At my company, with one of our applications, we have a dynamic key_func based on something retrieved from one of our dependencies, and we encountered your issue. We found a very ugly workaround that works, but it would be waaay better to have it work as a dependancy directly, without having to do our weird workaround. Let me know if I understood your use-case correctly, and if seeing parts of our workaround code could help you. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes, making this package work as a dependency would be great. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I think it could be usefull to be able to call async function for key_func and cost.
It would allow us to get the Request data, and use that as the cost.
My usecase is the following:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions