Replies: 3 comments
-
|
Looks like a bug. I'll investigate more and let you know. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
It is indeed a bug in ExtractData.lean. I have fixed it and will update the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
nIce! thanks for fixing it so quickly. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey
I was wondering why the premises that are in the same file as a parsed theorem not listed as premises? Is there intention behind it? I think this could improve the training data quite a bit.
Yes, during the testing of the reprover with a unseen mathlib4 file, one would have to add the new theorems to the retriever on the fly, but this should not be a real challenge, right?
Eg.
returns
and mem_ker is not annoated, nor defined as a premise, but it is defined in the file
mathlib4/Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Basic.lean, the same that was traced in the example above.( I ran that code from the demo.ipynb)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions