question about reproducing results from paper #22
Closed
maverick-harmonic
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
Hi, If I'm understanding correctly, the model is trained for only one step, so it's essentially not different from the pretrained ByT5? Can you run evaluate.py in debug mode (environment variable |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
That’s fantastic. Thanks!
…On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 4:09 PM Kaiyu Yang ***@***.***> wrote:
I just uploaded the checkpoints in PyTorch Lightning format so that you no
longer need the 1-step training trick.
https://huggingface.co/kaiyuy/leandojo-pl-ckpts/tree/main
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#22 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BBRKDHPAI35FN6RQNOYIMGTXSLYMBANCNFSM6AAAAAA22VTMQ4>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
My goal was to reproduce the results of tactic generation without retrieval on the novel premises split. Here is what I did:
ReProver/generator/confs/cli_novel_premises.yaml
[1] to create a checkpoint that I can use with the evaluation script [2]PYTHONPATH=$PYTHONPATH:~/w/lean-dojo/LeanDojo/src python prover/evaluate.py --data-path data/leandojo_benchmark/novel_premises/ --ckpt_path lightning_checkpoints/last.ckpt/ --split test --num-cpus 4 --with-gpus --timeout 60
Any ideas/tips on what I'm doing wrong?
[1] Here's the diff I used against commit
762c32fc6e8c6e29fa446dada8aac27f678fe4c8
.[2] See below:
[3]
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions