Skip to content

Conversation

@jguice
Copy link
Contributor

@jguice jguice commented Oct 30, 2025

This PR adds two new Markdown documents to the docs directory:

  • press-release.md: Contains the press release announcing Liatrio's Spec-Driven Workflow, describing the problem it addresses and how the framework provides structured context, versioning, and tools for AI-native development.
  • faq.md: Provides a frequently asked questions guide covering installation, prerequisites, integration with different tools, customization, iteration guidance, and other common queries about the workflow.

These files help communicate the purpose and usage of the Spec-Driven Workflow to teams and stakeholders.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a comprehensive FAQ covering workflow features, target users, installation, prerequisites, tool compatibility, integration strategies, iteration guidance, customization, adoption rationale, and cost considerations.
    • Added a press release introducing the Spec‑Driven Workflow as an installable, versioned offering; outlines problem/solution, key features (repeatable work breakdowns, artifact consistency, predictable locations), scalability options, leadership messaging, and usage/installation notes.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds two new Markdown documentation files under docs/: docs/faq.md (FAQ for the Spec‑Driven Workflow) and docs/press-release.md (press release announcing the workflow). No code, build, or public API changes are included.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation additions
docs/faq.md, docs/press-release.md
Adds docs/faq.md with a labeled FAQ covering problem statement, target users, installation/prerequisites, tool compatibility, differentiation from templates, integration/adoption guidance, iteration size, in-repo Markdown feasibility, solo usage, customization, learning curve, and cost. Adds docs/press-release.md with a press release describing the Spec‑Driven Workflow, feature list, install/usage notes, leadership quotes, scaling/deployment scopes, and a prompts-first framing.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Omitted — changes are documentation-only and do not modify control flow or runtime behavior.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Rationale: Documentation-only, small and homogeneous additions.
  • Review focal points:
    • Factual accuracy and consistency with project branding/terms
    • Markdown formatting and readability
    • Any internal links or dates in the new docs

Poem

🐰 I hopped through lines of docs today,

FAQs neat and bright as day,
A press release with trumpet cheer,
Specs and prompts now hovering near,
Tiny paws, big pages play. 🥕📜

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The PR description lacks the required template structure (Why/What Changed/Additional Notes sections and checklist items), though it does convey what was added. Use the repository's PR template with sections for Why, What Changed, Additional Notes, and complete the checklist including linked spec IDs and test/linter confirmation.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately summarizes the main changes: adding two new markdown documentation files (press-release.md and faq.md) to the docs directory.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch jguice-patch-1

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/press-release.md (1)

15-15: Minor grammar refinement: hyphenate compound adjective.

The phrase "batch deployable increments" uses a compound adjective that should be hyphenated for clarity per standard English grammar.

-- Repeatable work breakdown guides small batch deployable increments that keep feedback tight and progress visible.
+- Repeatable work breakdown guides small batch-deployable increments that keep feedback tight and progress visible.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 12fc545 and 4ca1d4c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/faq.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/press-release.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run tests and linting
docs/faq.md

[error] 1-1: markdownlint-fix failed. MD001: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time. The hook modified the file. Re-run pre-commit (pre-commit run --all-files) to verify and commit.

🪛 LanguageTool
docs/press-release.md

[grammar] ~15-~15: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...- Repeatable work breakdown guides small batch deployable increments that keep fe...

(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
docs/faq.md

3-3: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3

(MD001, heading-increment)


3-3: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


6-6: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


9-9: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


12-12: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


15-15: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


18-18: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


21-21: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


24-24: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


27-27: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


30-30: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


33-33: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


36-36: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


39-39: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


42-42: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/press-release.md (1)

1-33: Content and structure look solid.

The press release is well-organized with a clear problem statement (line 5), solution overview (line 9), and scaling guidance (line 25). The heading hierarchy is correct, supporting quotes add credibility, and the messaging is consistent with the FAQ. The document effectively communicates the key value propositions of the workflow.

@ryderstorm
Copy link
Collaborator

@claude fix the ci failure

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Oct 30, 2025

Claude finished @ryderstorm's task —— View job


Fixing CI Failure ✅

Fixed the markdown linting errors that were causing the CI to fail.

Todo List

  • Read the current state of both markdown files
  • Fix docs/faq.md markdown linting errors (heading levels and blank lines)
  • Fix docs/press-release.md grammar issue (hyphenation)
  • Commit and push the changes

Changes Made

  • faq.md: Changed all question headings from h3 (###) to h2 (##) and added blank lines after each heading to fix MD001 and MD022 linting errors
  • press-release.md: Fixed hyphenation on line 15: "batch deployable" → "batch-deployable"

Summary

All markdown linting errors have been resolved. The changes have been committed and pushed to the jguice-patch-1 branch. The CI should now pass when it runs the markdownlint checks.


Job Run: https://github.com/liatrio-labs/spec-driven-workflow/actions/runs/$RUN_ID | Branch: jguice-patch-1

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ca1d4c and 5ae0a0f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/faq.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/press-release.md (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • docs/faq.md
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/press-release.md (2)

1-33: Overall structure and messaging are strong.

The press release is well-organized with a clear problem-solution narrative arc, concrete features, and scaling guidance. The tone is professional and appropriately pitched for stakeholder communication. No markdown syntax errors detected; formatting is consistent throughout.


1-33: Documentation files pass markdown validation; no issues found.

The verification confirms that docs/press-release.md and docs/faq.md are valid:

  • Markdownlint validation completed with zero errors
  • Both files have proper heading hierarchy and structure
  • No broken markdown links detected
  • Markdown syntax is valid

If a CI failure exists, it is not caused by markdown content issues in these documentation files. Any CI failure would stem from other repository checks.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
docs/press-release.md (1)

20-25: Remove or verify attributed quotes before publication.

The quotes from Jordan Ramos (VectorScale) and Maya Chen (Skyline Robotics) could not be verified in the previous review and pose a credibility risk:

  • Maya Chen at Skyline Robotics: No public evidence of this person holding this title at this company. Skyline Robotics' official site, LinkedIn, and press coverage do not list a Director of Product named Maya Chen.
  • Jordan Ramos at VectorScale: VectorScale appears to be a dating/chat app company (Migo), not an AI-native development consultancy—attribution context is misaligned.

Publishing unverifiable or misattributed quotes damages organizational credibility, especially in a press release.

Either:

  1. Verify these individuals and document their approval for attribution, or
  2. Replace with generic testimonials (e.g., "A VP of Engineering at a high-growth AI company stated..."), or
  3. Remove the quotes entirely.
 Engineering leaders already see impact:
 
-> "Liatrio's Spec‑Driven Workflow cut our context switching in half," said Jordan Ramos, VP Engineering at VectorScale. "Specs, tickets, and agent prompts now live in the same backbone, and in our pilot quarter AI‑generated changes landed right the first time 40 percent more often."
+> "Liatrio's Spec‑Driven Workflow cut our context switching in half," said a VP of Engineering at a high-growth AI company. "Specs, tickets, and agent prompts now live in the same backbone, and in our pilot quarter AI‑generated changes landed right the first time 40 percent more often."
 >
-> "Product teams finally describe outcomes the same way engineering builds them," added Maya Chen, Director of Product at Skyline Robotics. "We now draft outcome specs in hours instead of days because the workflow keeps every ticket, prompt, and roadmap in sync."
+> "Product teams finally describe outcomes the same way engineering builds them," added a Director of Product at a robotics company. "We now draft outcome specs in hours instead of days because the workflow keeps every ticket, prompt, and roadmap in sync."
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ae0a0f and 4bf82de.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/faq.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/press-release.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run tests and linting
docs/press-release.md

[error] 1-1: markdownlint-fix modified this file during pre-commit. Run 'pre-commit run --all-files' to fix formatting.

docs/faq.md

[error] 1-1: markdownlint-fix modified this file during pre-commit. Run 'pre-commit run --all-files' to fix formatting.

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
docs/press-release.md

2-2: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)

docs/faq.md

2-2: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/faq.md (1)

4-58: LGTM—markdown structure is now correct.

The FAQ sections are properly formatted with ## headings, blank lines after each heading, and clear answer text. The structure addresses the previous MD001 and MD022 issues flagged in the earlier review. Once the h1 heading spacing is fixed (above), the linting should pass.

docs/press-release.md (1)

6-19: LGTM—core messaging and structure are clear.

The problem statement, solution overview, and feature list clearly communicate the value of the Spec-Driven Workflow. The scaling examples (lines 28–34) effectively show deployment flexibility. Once the attribution issues are addressed and the markdown linting is fixed, this is publication-ready.

Comment on lines 1 to 2
> **Note:** This FAQ is a hypothetical example created for demonstration purposes. It illustrates how to document and answer common questions about the Spec-Driven Workflow and is included in this repository as sample documentation.
# Frequently Asked Questions
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Add blank line between disclaimer and heading to fix markdown linting.

The h1 heading on line 2 lacks a blank line above it (after the disclaimer blockquote on line 1), triggering an MD022 linting violation and causing the pre-commit hook to fail. This is blocking the pipeline.

Apply this diff:

 > **Note:** This FAQ is a hypothetical example created for demonstration purposes. It illustrates how to document and answer common questions about the Spec-Driven Workflow and is included in this repository as sample documentation.
+
 # Frequently Asked Questions
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
> **Note:** This FAQ is a hypothetical example created for demonstration purposes. It illustrates how to document and answer common questions about the Spec-Driven Workflow and is included in this repository as sample documentation.
# Frequently Asked Questions
> **Note:** This FAQ is a hypothetical example created for demonstration purposes. It illustrates how to document and answer common questions about the Spec-Driven Workflow and is included in this repository as sample documentation.
# Frequently Asked Questions
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run tests and linting

[error] 1-1: markdownlint-fix modified this file during pre-commit. Run 'pre-commit run --all-files' to fix formatting.

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

2-2: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docs/faq.md around lines 1 to 2, the H1 heading lacks a blank line after the
blockquote disclaimer which triggers an MD022 lint error; fix by inserting a
single blank line between the disclaimer line and the "# Frequently Asked
Questions" heading so the heading is separated from the blockquote.

Comment on lines 1 to 2
> **Note:** This press release is a hypothetical example created for demonstration purposes. It illustrates how to document and communicate the Spec-Driven Workflow and is included in this repository as sample documentation.
# Liatrio Launches Spec-Driven Workflow: A Codified, Versioned, Installable Framework for AI-Native Development
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Add blank line between disclaimer and heading to fix markdown linting.

The h1 heading on line 2 lacks a blank line above it (after the disclaimer blockquote on line 1), triggering an MD022 linting violation and causing the pre-commit hook to fail.

Apply this diff:

 > **Note:** This press release is a hypothetical example created for demonstration purposes. It illustrates how to document and communicate the Spec-Driven Workflow and is included in this repository as sample documentation.
+
 # Liatrio Launches Spec-Driven Workflow: A Codified, Versioned, Installable Framework for AI-Native Development
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
> **Note:** This press release is a hypothetical example created for demonstration purposes. It illustrates how to document and communicate the Spec-Driven Workflow and is included in this repository as sample documentation.
# Liatrio Launches Spec-Driven Workflow: A Codified, Versioned, Installable Framework for AI-Native Development
> **Note:** This press release is a hypothetical example created for demonstration purposes. It illustrates how to document and communicate the Spec-Driven Workflow and is included in this repository as sample documentation.
# Liatrio Launches Spec-Driven Workflow: A Codified, Versioned, Installable Framework for AI-Native Development
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run tests and linting

[error] 1-1: markdownlint-fix modified this file during pre-commit. Run 'pre-commit run --all-files' to fix formatting.

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

2-2: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docs/press-release.md around lines 1 to 2, the H1 heading is immediately
after the blockquote disclaimer which violates MD022; insert a single blank line
between the blockquote line and the heading so there is an empty line separating
the disclaimer and the "# Liatrio Launches..." heading to satisfy markdown
linting and the pre-commit hook.

jguice and others added 5 commits November 24, 2025 17:19
- Change all FAQ headings from h3 to h2 and add blank lines after headings
- Fix hyphenation in press-release.md: "batch deployable" → "batch-deployable"

This resolves MD001 and MD022 linting errors that were causing CI failures.

Co-authored-by: Damien Storm <[email protected]>
@ryderstorm ryderstorm changed the title Add press release and FAQ markdown docs docs: Add press release and FAQ markdown docs Nov 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
docs/press-release.md (1)

1-2: Add blank line between disclaimer and h1 heading to fix markdown linting.

Line 2 lacks the required blank line after the disclaimer blockquote, triggering an MD022 linting violation that blocks the CI pipeline. This issue persists despite being marked as addressed in prior commits.

Apply this diff:

 > **Note:** This press release is a hypothetical example created for demonstration purposes. It illustrates how to document and communicate the Spec-Driven Workflow and is included in this repository as sample documentation.
+
 # Liatrio Launches Spec-Driven Workflow: A Codified, Versioned, Installable Framework for AI-Native Development
docs/faq.md (1)

1-2: Add blank line between disclaimer and h1 heading to fix markdown linting.

Line 2 lacks the required blank line after the disclaimer blockquote, triggering an MD022 linting violation that blocks the CI pipeline. This issue persists despite being marked as addressed in prior commits.

Apply this diff:

 > **Note:** This FAQ is a hypothetical example created for demonstration purposes. It illustrates how to document and answer common questions about the Spec-Driven Workflow and is included in this repository as sample documentation.
+
 # Frequently Asked Questions
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4bf82de and 2e76f56.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/faq.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/press-release.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
docs/faq.md

2-2: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
docs/faq.md (1)

1-3: Fix markdown linting: add blank line after disclaimer blockquote.

Lines 1–2 end the blockquote disclaimer, but line 3 (the h1 heading) lacks a preceding blank line. This violates MD022 (blanks-around-headings) and is blocking the pre-commit hook.

Apply this diff:

 > **Note:** This FAQ is a hypothetical example created for demonstration purposes. It illustrates how to document and answer common questions about the Spec-Driven Workflow and is included in this repository as sample documentation.
 >
+
 # Frequently Asked Questions
docs/press-release.md (1)

1-3: Fix markdown linting: add blank line after disclaimer blockquote.

Lines 1–2 end the blockquote disclaimer, but line 3 (the h1 heading) lacks a preceding blank line. This violates MD022 (blanks-around-headings) and is blocking the pre-commit hook.

Apply this diff:

 > **Note:** This press release is a hypothetical example created for demonstration purposes. It illustrates how to document and communicate the Spec-Driven Workflow and is included in this repository as sample documentation.
 >
+
 # Liatrio Launches Spec-Driven Workflow: A Codified, Versioned, Installable Framework for AI-Native Development
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e76f56 and 24b151f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/faq.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/press-release.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/faq.md (1)

5-59: Content and Q&A structure look good.

The FAQ content is well-organized with clear questions and concise answers. Heading levels and blank lines are properly formatted throughout the Q&A sections.

docs/press-release.md (2)

5-20: Problem-solution messaging is clear and well-structured.

The narrative effectively frames the challenge (inconsistent AI-native development) and positions the workflow as a versioned, installable solution. Feature list is concrete.


27-35: Scalability section clearly articulates deployment flexibility.

The "Built to Scale" section effectively communicates that the workflow adapts to different repository and tooling architectures without requiring heavy setup.

Comment on lines +21 to +25
Engineering leaders already see impact:

> “Liatrio’s Spec‑Driven Workflow cut our context switching in half,” said Jordan Ramos, VP Engineering at VectorScale. “Specs, tickets, and agent prompts now live in the same backbone, and in our pilot quarter AI‑generated changes landed right the first time 40 percent more often.”
>
> “Product teams finally describe outcomes the same way engineering builds them,” added Maya Chen, Director of Product at Skyline Robotics. “We now draft outcome specs in hours instead of days because the workflow keeps every ticket, prompt, and roadmap in sync.”
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

❓ Verification inconclusive

Remove or verify quote attributions before publication; credibility blocker.

Prior reviews flagged critical attribution issues that remain unresolved:

  • Line 23: "Jordan Ramos, VP Engineering at VectorScale" — Company/individual verification inconclusive. "VectorScale" does not appear in standard business databases.
  • Line 25: "Maya Chen, Director of Product at Skyline Robotics" — No public evidence this person holds this title at Skyline Robotics. Official company sources and team profiles do not list a Maya Chen in this role.

Publishing unverifiable or misattributed quotes damages organizational credibility and may expose Liatrio to reputational risk.

Action required: Before merging, either:

  1. Verify and document: Provide evidence that both individuals hold/held these titles at these companies and have formally approved these statements for public attribution.
  2. Replace with generic testimonials: Rewrite quotes as unattributed testimonials (e.g., "Engineering leaders at high-growth AI companies report reduced context switching…").
  3. Remove quotes: Delete this section entirely if verification cannot be completed.

I'll verify the claims in the review comment by searching for information about the companies and individuals mentioned.

I'll do one more targeted search to confirm VectorScale doesn't exist as a company entity.

Remove unverified quote attributions before publication.

Verification confirms the review comment's concerns are substantiated:

  • VectorScale + Jordan Ramos: No company named "VectorScale" appears in any public database, and no Jordan Ramos is publicly documented as a VP of Engineering at any company matching that name.

  • Skyline Robotics + Maya Chen: Skyline Robotics is a real company with publicly documented team leadership, including CEO Michael Brown and other executives, but no "Maya Chen" or "Director of Product" role is listed.

Publishing unverifiable or fabricated attributions creates credibility risk before launch. Both quotes must either be verified with documented approval from the attributed individuals, replaced with generic testimonials (e.g., "Engineering leaders report..."), or removed entirely.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docs/press-release.md around lines 21 to 25, the two quoted attributions to
"Jordan Ramos, VP Engineering at VectorScale" and "Maya Chen, Director of
Product at Skyline Robotics" are unverified and must be removed or replaced;
either obtain documented approval and add a citation or replace both quotes with
a generic, non-attributed testimonial (e.g., "Engineering leaders report...") or
remove them entirely, and update the surrounding copy so it reads naturally
without named attributions.

@ryderstorm ryderstorm changed the title docs: Add press release and FAQ markdown docs docs: add press release and FAQ markdown docs Nov 24, 2025
@ryderstorm ryderstorm merged commit 9ead128 into main Nov 24, 2025
9 of 11 checks passed
@ryderstorm ryderstorm deleted the jguice-patch-1 branch November 24, 2025 23:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants