Replies: 1 comment
-
This is fantastic!! Thank you @acul71 🚀 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
TODO Analysis Summary: py-libp2p Issues Overview
Last review: August 2025
Executive Summary
This document provides a comprehensive overview of all TODO and FIXME issues analyzed in the py-libp2p codebase. The analysis covers 15 major issues across 8 different modules, ranging from simple type fixes to complex architectural improvements.
Table of Contents
Multiselect Type Consistency✅ Done in: FIXME: Make TProtocol Optional[TProtocol] to keep types consistent #770Issue Categorization Table
Sorted by Priority (High → Medium → Low) then by Difficulty (Expert → Medium → Easy)
Multiselect Type ConsistencyTest Notify IssuesDetailed Issue Analysis
BasicHost.get_addrs() p2p postfix
Location:
libp2p/host/basic_host.py:140
Type: API Design
Priority: Medium
Difficulty: Medium
Breaking Change: Yes
Discussion: GitHub Discussion #716
Summary: The
get_addrs()
method currently adds/p2p/{peer_id}
postfix to transport addresses, but the TODO suggests this should be removed for cleaner separation of concerns.Impact:
Recommendation: Implement Option B (add new method) for backward compatibility.
Circuit v2 Relay Issues
Location:
libp2p/relay/circuit_v2/
Type: Security
Priority: High
Difficulty: Expert
Breaking Change: No
Discussion: GitHub Discussion #720
Summary: Four critical security issues in circuit v2 relay implementation:
Missing signature generation for productionDONEMissing voucher and signature verificationDONEImpact:
Recommendation: Address issue 4 and then issue 3
Get Mux Return Type
Current Status: ✅ Done in: #770
Location:
libp2p/abc.py:1131
Type: Type Safety
Priority: Low
Difficulty: Easy
Breaking Change: No
Discussion: GitHub Discussion #729
Summary: The
get_mux()
method returnsAny
but should returnIMultiselectMuxer
for proper type safety.Impact:
Recommendation: Implement Option A (interface-based approach).
Mplex Stream Muxer Issues
Location:
libp2p/stream_muxer/mplex/mplex.py
Type: Type Safety
Priority: Medium
Difficulty: Easy
Breaking Change: No
Discussion: GitHub Discussion #722
Summary: Four type consistency and logging issues in mplex implementation:
send_message()
Impact:
Recommendation: Address all four issues for better code quality.
MplexStream Issues
Location:
libp2p/stream_muxer/mplex/mplex_stream.py
Type: Concurrency
Priority: High
Difficulty: Medium
Breaking Change: No
Discussion: GitHub Discussion #723
Summary: Four concurrency and error handling issues:
Missing read/write locks for message interleavingDONEMissing error handling with timeout in closeDONEMissing error handling for send_message failuresDONEImpact:
Recommendation: Implement Missing deadline functionality
Multiselect Type Consistency✅ Done in: #770Location:
libp2p/protocol_muxer/multiselect.py:48
Type: Type Safety
Priority: Medium
Difficulty: Easy
Breaking Change: No
Discussion: GitHub Discussion #718
Summary: Type inconsistency between interface (
TProtocol | None
) and implementation (TProtocol
).Impact:
Recommendation: Implement Option A (make return type optional).
MuxerMultistream Timeout
Location:
libp2p/stream_muxer/muxer_multistream.py:34
Type: Configurability
Priority: Low
Difficulty: Medium / Low
Breaking Change: No
Discussion: GitHub Discussion #725
Summary: Missing timeout configuration in MuxerMultistream (hard coded 5 secs)
Noise Security IssuesLocation:
libp2p/security/noise/
Type: Interoperability
Priority: High
Difficulty: Expert
Breaking Change: Yes
Discussion: GitHub Discussion #721
Summary: Two interoperability issues with Go implementation:
Message prefix behavior inconsistencyFIXEDMissing static key storage for IK pattern (JS, and GO implementation don't have this)DEPRECATED Removed TODORecommendation: Investigate Go implementation and align behavior.Pubsub Issues
Location:
libp2p/pubsub/
Type: Performance
Priority: Medium
Difficulty: Medium
Breaking Change: No
Discussion: GitHub Discussion #719
Summary:
Impact:
Recommendation: Address CRITICAL ISSUEs.
Pubsub Missing Tests
Location:
tests/core/pubsub/test_pubsub.py:393
Type: Testing
Priority: Medium
Difficulty: Medium
Breaking Change: No
Discussion: GitHub Discussion #728
Summary: Missing tests for
test_stream_handler
andtest_handle_peer_queue
that need alignment with Go implementation.Impact:
Recommendation: Implement hybrid approach (direct + integration tests).
Swarm Issues
Location:
libp2p/network/swarm.py
Type: Architecture
Priority: High
Difficulty: Expert
Breaking Change: No
Discussion: GitHub Discussion #717
Summary: Two architectural issues:
Listener nursery I/O agnostic API issueShould be dismissedImpact:
Recommendation: Implement Option A (multiple connections per peer) for fault tolerance.
Test Notify IssuesDONELocation:
tests/core/network/test_notify.py
Type: Test Coverage
Priority: Low
Difficulty: Easy
Breaking Change: No
Discussion: GitHub Discussion #724
Summary: Missing tests for
closed_stream
andlisten_close
methods that are not implemented in swarm.Impact:
Recommendation: Implement basic test structure first.
Transport Issues
Location:
libp2p/transport/
Type: Architecture
Priority: High (Issue 1) / Low (Issue 2)
Difficulty: Expert (Issue 1) / Beginner (Issue 2)
Breaking Change: Yes (Issue 1) / No (Issue 2)
Discussion: GitHub Discussion #726
Summary: Two architectural issues:
TCPListener nursery dependency - Poor design choice violating Trio's structured concurrency principlesToo complexupgrade_listener function purpose- Fix in fix: remove unused upgrade_listener function (Issue 2 from #726) #884Impact:
Recommendations:
upgrade_listener
function entirelyGood First Issues
For New Contributors
.
Test Notify Issues- Adding missing tests DONEBenefits for New Contributors
Expert Level Issues
For Experienced Contributors
2. Noise Security Issues - Protocol interoperabilityRequirements for Expert Issues
Implementation Roadmap
Phase 1: Quick Wins (1-2 weeks)
Phase 2: Important Improvements (2-4 weeks)
Phase 3: Major Architecture (1-2 months)
Risk Assessment
Low Risk Issues
Medium Risk Issues
High Risk Issues
Conclusion
The py-libp2p codebase has a good mix of issues suitable for contributors at all levels. The high-priority security and reliability issues should be addressed first, followed by the medium-priority improvements. The low-priority issues provide excellent opportunities for new contributors to get familiar with the codebase.
Key Recommendations:
This analysis provides a roadmap for systematic improvement of the py-libp2p codebase while maintaining stability and encouraging community contribution.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions