Skip to content

Abundant fragment ions missing for CL(-2) #4

@dominik-kopczynski

Description

@dominik-kopczynski

Fragment m/z 361 and 375 missing…?
Are other low abundant fragment m/z values between 239 and 511 calculated correctly?
Fragment ion nomenclature is also somewhat misleading/incorrect.

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions