@@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ enum UpdateFulfillFetch {
10151015 NewClaim {
10161016 monitor_update: ChannelMonitorUpdate,
10171017 htlc_value_msat: u64,
1018- msg: Option<msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC> ,
1018+ update_non_blocked: bool ,
10191019 },
10201020 DuplicateClaim {},
10211021}
@@ -5349,8 +5349,8 @@ impl<SP: Deref> FundedChannel<SP> where
53495349 let mon_update_id = self.context.latest_monitor_update_id; // Forget the ChannelMonitor update
53505350 let fulfill_resp = self.get_update_fulfill_htlc(htlc_id_arg, payment_preimage_arg, None, logger);
53515351 self.context.latest_monitor_update_id = mon_update_id;
5352- if let UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim { msg , .. } = fulfill_resp {
5353- assert!(msg.is_none() ); // The HTLC must have ended up in the holding cell.
5352+ if let UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim { update_non_blocked , .. } = fulfill_resp {
5353+ assert!(!update_non_blocked ); // The HTLC must have ended up in the holding cell.
53545354 }
53555355 }
53565356
@@ -5437,7 +5437,7 @@ impl<SP: Deref> FundedChannel<SP> where
54375437 // TODO: We may actually be able to switch to a fulfill here, though its
54385438 // rare enough it may not be worth the complexity burden.
54395439 debug_assert!(false, "Tried to fulfill an HTLC that was already failed");
5440- return UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim { monitor_update, htlc_value_msat, msg: None };
5440+ return UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim { monitor_update, htlc_value_msat, update_non_blocked: false };
54415441 }
54425442 },
54435443 _ => {}
@@ -5447,15 +5447,15 @@ impl<SP: Deref> FundedChannel<SP> where
54475447 self.context.holding_cell_htlc_updates.push(HTLCUpdateAwaitingACK::ClaimHTLC {
54485448 payment_preimage: payment_preimage_arg, htlc_id: htlc_id_arg,
54495449 });
5450- return UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim { monitor_update, htlc_value_msat, msg: None };
5450+ return UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim { monitor_update, htlc_value_msat, update_non_blocked: false };
54515451 }
54525452
54535453 {
54545454 let htlc = &mut self.context.pending_inbound_htlcs[pending_idx];
54555455 if let InboundHTLCState::Committed = htlc.state {
54565456 } else {
54575457 debug_assert!(false, "Have an inbound HTLC we tried to claim before it was fully committed to");
5458- return UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim { monitor_update, htlc_value_msat, msg: None };
5458+ return UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim { monitor_update, htlc_value_msat, update_non_blocked: false };
54595459 }
54605460 log_trace!(logger, "Upgrading HTLC {} to LocalRemoved with a Fulfill in channel {}!", &htlc.payment_hash, &self.context.channel_id);
54615461 htlc.state = InboundHTLCState::LocalRemoved(InboundHTLCRemovalReason::Fulfill(payment_preimage_arg.clone()));
@@ -5464,11 +5464,7 @@ impl<SP: Deref> FundedChannel<SP> where
54645464 UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim {
54655465 monitor_update,
54665466 htlc_value_msat,
5467- msg: Some(msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC {
5468- channel_id: self.context.channel_id(),
5469- htlc_id: htlc_id_arg,
5470- payment_preimage: payment_preimage_arg,
5471- }),
5467+ update_non_blocked: true,
54725468 }
54735469 }
54745470
@@ -5478,13 +5474,13 @@ impl<SP: Deref> FundedChannel<SP> where
54785474 ) -> UpdateFulfillCommitFetch where L::Target: Logger {
54795475 let release_cs_monitor = self.context.blocked_monitor_updates.is_empty();
54805476 match self.get_update_fulfill_htlc(htlc_id, payment_preimage, payment_info, logger) {
5481- UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim { mut monitor_update, htlc_value_msat, msg } => {
5477+ UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim { mut monitor_update, htlc_value_msat, update_non_blocked: msg } => {
54825478 // Even if we aren't supposed to let new monitor updates with commitment state
54835479 // updates run, we still need to push the preimage ChannelMonitorUpdateStep no
54845480 // matter what. Sadly, to push a new monitor update which flies before others
54855481 // already queued, we have to insert it into the pending queue and update the
54865482 // update_ids of all the following monitors.
5487- if release_cs_monitor && msg.is_some() {
5483+ if release_cs_monitor && msg {
54885484 let mut additional_update = self.build_commitment_no_status_check(logger);
54895485 // build_commitment_no_status_check may bump latest_monitor_id but we want them
54905486 // to be strictly increasing by one, so decrement it here.
@@ -5497,7 +5493,7 @@ impl<SP: Deref> FundedChannel<SP> where
54975493 for held_update in self.context.blocked_monitor_updates.iter_mut() {
54985494 held_update.update.update_id += 1;
54995495 }
5500- if msg.is_some() {
5496+ if msg {
55015497 debug_assert!(false, "If there is a pending blocked monitor we should have MonitorUpdateInProgress set");
55025498 let update = self.build_commitment_no_status_check(logger);
55035499 self.context.blocked_monitor_updates.push(PendingChannelMonitorUpdate {
@@ -5506,7 +5502,7 @@ impl<SP: Deref> FundedChannel<SP> where
55065502 }
55075503 }
55085504
5509- self.monitor_updating_paused(false, msg.is_some() , false, Vec::new(), Vec::new(), Vec::new());
5505+ self.monitor_updating_paused(false, msg, false, Vec::new(), Vec::new(), Vec::new());
55105506 UpdateFulfillCommitFetch::NewClaim { monitor_update, htlc_value_msat, }
55115507 },
55125508 UpdateFulfillFetch::DuplicateClaim {} => UpdateFulfillCommitFetch::DuplicateClaim {},
0 commit comments