Capture announcement signatures resend in reconnection tests

We'll use this in the next commit to test the resend logic for
`announcement_signatures` when reestablishing a channel that had a
pending splice become locked.

Author: wpaulino

lightning/src/ln/async_signer_tests.rs

@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ fn do_test_async_raa_peer_disconnect(
 	}
 
 	// Expect the RAA
-	let (_, revoke_and_ack, commitment_signed, resend_order) =
+	let (_, revoke_and_ack, commitment_signed, resend_order, _) =
 		handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(dst, src);
 	if test_case == UnblockSignerAcrossDisconnectCase::AtEnd {
 		assert!(revoke_and_ack.is_none());
@@ -612,14 +612,14 @@ fn do_test_async_raa_peer_disconnect(
 	dst.node.signer_unblocked(Some((src_node_id, chan_id)));
 
 	if test_case == UnblockSignerAcrossDisconnectCase::AtEnd {
-		let (_, revoke_and_ack, commitment_signed, resend_order) =
+		let (_, revoke_and_ack, commitment_signed, resend_order, _) =
 			handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(dst, src);
 		assert!(revoke_and_ack.is_some());
 		assert!(commitment_signed.is_some());
 		assert!(resend_order == RAACommitmentOrder::RevokeAndACKFirst);
 	} else {
 		// Make sure we don't double send the RAA.
-		let (_, revoke_and_ack, commitment_signed, _) = handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(dst, src);
+		let (_, revoke_and_ack, commitment_signed, _, _) = handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(dst, src);
 		assert!(revoke_and_ack.is_none());
 		assert!(commitment_signed.is_none());
 	}
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ fn do_test_async_commitment_signature_peer_disconnect(
 	}
 
 	// Expect the RAA
-	let (_, revoke_and_ack, commitment_signed, _) = handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(dst, src);
+	let (_, revoke_and_ack, commitment_signed, _, _) = handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(dst, src);
 	assert!(revoke_and_ack.is_some());
 	if test_case == UnblockSignerAcrossDisconnectCase::AtEnd {
 		assert!(commitment_signed.is_none());
@@ -758,11 +758,11 @@ fn do_test_async_commitment_signature_peer_disconnect(
 	dst.node.signer_unblocked(Some((src_node_id, chan_id)));
 
 	if test_case == UnblockSignerAcrossDisconnectCase::AtEnd {
-		let (_, _, commitment_signed, _) = handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(dst, src);
+		let (_, _, commitment_signed, _, _) = handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(dst, src);
 		assert!(commitment_signed.is_some());
 	} else {
 		// Make sure we don't double send the CS.
-		let (_, _, commitment_signed, _) = handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(dst, src);
+		let (_, _, commitment_signed, _, _) = handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(dst, src);
 		assert!(commitment_signed.is_none());
 	}
 }
@@ -877,6 +877,7 @@ fn do_test_async_commitment_signature_ordering(monitor_update_failure: bool) {
 	assert!(as_resp.0.is_none());
 	assert!(as_resp.1.is_none());
 	assert!(as_resp.2.is_none());
+	assert!(as_resp.4.is_none());
 
 	if monitor_update_failure {
 		chanmon_cfgs[0].persister.set_update_ret(ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
@@ -896,6 +897,7 @@ fn do_test_async_commitment_signature_ordering(monitor_update_failure: bool) {
 	assert!(as_resp.0.is_none());
 	assert!(as_resp.1.is_none());
 	assert!(as_resp.2.is_none());
+	assert!(as_resp.4.is_none());
 
 	nodes[0].enable_channel_signer_op(&node_b_id, &chan_id, SignerOp::SignCounterpartyCommitment);
 	nodes[0].node.signer_unblocked(Some((node_b_id, chan_id)));
@@ -912,6 +914,9 @@ fn do_test_async_commitment_signature_ordering(monitor_update_failure: bool) {
 
 	assert!(as_resp.3 == RAACommitmentOrder::CommitmentFirst);
 
+	assert!(as_resp.4.is_none());
+	assert!(bs_resp.4.is_none());
+
 	// Now that everything is restored, get the CS + RAA and handle them.
 	nodes[1]
 		.node

lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs

@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ fn do_test_simple_monitor_temporary_update_fail(disconnect: bool) {
 		nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(node_a_id);
 		let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
 		reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
+		reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs = (true, true);
 		reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 	}
 

lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs

@@ -4796,11 +4796,14 @@ macro_rules! handle_chan_reestablish_msgs {
 				None
 			};
 
-		if let Some(&MessageSendEvent::SendAnnouncementSignatures { ref node_id, msg: _ }) =
+		let mut announcement_sigs = None; // May be now or later
+		if let Some(&MessageSendEvent::SendAnnouncementSignatures { ref node_id, ref msg }) =
 			msg_events.get(idx)
 		{
 			idx += 1;
 			assert_eq!(*node_id, $dst_node.node.get_our_node_id());
+			assert!(announcement_sigs.is_none());
+			announcement_sigs = Some(msg.clone());
 		}
 
 		let mut had_channel_update = false; // ChannelUpdate may be now or later, but not both
@@ -4859,23 +4862,33 @@ macro_rules! handle_chan_reestablish_msgs {
 			}
 		}
 
+		if let Some(&MessageSendEvent::SendAnnouncementSignatures { ref node_id, ref msg }) =
+			msg_events.get(idx)
+		{
+			idx += 1;
+			assert_eq!(*node_id, $dst_node.node.get_our_node_id());
+			assert!(announcement_sigs.is_none());
+			announcement_sigs = Some(msg.clone());
+		}
+
 		if let Some(&MessageSendEvent::SendChannelUpdate { ref node_id, .. }) = msg_events.get(idx)
 		{
 			assert_eq!(*node_id, $dst_node.node.get_our_node_id());
 			idx += 1;
 			assert!(!had_channel_update);
 		}
 
-		assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), idx);
+		assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), idx, "{msg_events:?}");
 
-		(channel_ready, revoke_and_ack, commitment_update, order)
+		(channel_ready, revoke_and_ack, commitment_update, order, announcement_sigs)
 	}};
 }
 
 pub struct ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> {
 	pub node_a: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>,
 	pub node_b: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>,
 	pub send_channel_ready: (bool, bool),
+	pub send_announcement_sigs: (bool, bool),
 	pub pending_responding_commitment_signed: (bool, bool),
 	/// Indicates that the pending responding commitment signed will be a dup for the recipient,
 	/// and no monitor update is expected
@@ -4894,6 +4907,7 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> {
 			node_a,
 			node_b,
 			send_channel_ready: (false, false),
+			send_announcement_sigs: (false, false),
 			pending_responding_commitment_signed: (false, false),
 			pending_responding_commitment_signed_dup_monitor: (false, false),
 			pending_htlc_adds: (0, 0),
@@ -4913,6 +4927,7 @@ pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(args: ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>) {
 		node_a,
 		node_b,
 		send_channel_ready,
+		send_announcement_sigs,
 		pending_htlc_adds,
 		pending_htlc_claims,
 		pending_htlc_fails,
@@ -4994,7 +5009,7 @@ pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(args: ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>) {
 				&& pending_cell_htlc_fails.1 == 0)
 	);
 
-	for chan_msgs in resp_1.drain(..) {
+	for mut chan_msgs in resp_1.drain(..) {
 		if send_channel_ready.0 {
 			node_a.node.handle_channel_ready(node_b_id, &chan_msgs.0.unwrap());
 			let announcement_event = node_a.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
@@ -5009,6 +5024,18 @@ pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(args: ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>) {
 		} else {
 			assert!(chan_msgs.0.is_none());
 		}
+		if send_announcement_sigs.0 {
+			let announcement_sigs = chan_msgs.4.take().unwrap();
+			node_a.node.handle_announcement_signatures(node_b_id, &announcement_sigs);
+			let msg_events = node_a.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+			assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1, "{msg_events:?}");
+			if let MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelAnnouncement { .. } = msg_events[0] {
+			} else {
+				panic!("Unexpected event! {:?}", msg_events[0]);
+			}
+		} else {
+			assert!(chan_msgs.4.is_none());
+		}
 		if pending_raa.0 {
 			assert!(chan_msgs.3 == RAACommitmentOrder::RevokeAndACKFirst);
 			node_a.node.handle_revoke_and_ack(node_b_id, &chan_msgs.1.unwrap());
@@ -5073,7 +5100,7 @@ pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(args: ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>) {
 		}
 	}
 
-	for chan_msgs in resp_2.drain(..) {
+	for mut chan_msgs in resp_2.drain(..) {
 		if send_channel_ready.1 {
 			node_b.node.handle_channel_ready(node_a_id, &chan_msgs.0.unwrap());
 			let announcement_event = node_b.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
@@ -5088,6 +5115,18 @@ pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(args: ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>) {
 		} else {
 			assert!(chan_msgs.0.is_none());
 		}
+		if send_announcement_sigs.1 {
+			let announcement_sigs = chan_msgs.4.take().unwrap();
+			node_b.node.handle_announcement_signatures(node_a_id, &announcement_sigs);
+			let mut msg_events = node_b.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+			assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1, "{msg_events:?}");
+			if let MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelAnnouncement { .. } = msg_events.remove(0) {
+			} else {
+				panic!();
+			}
+		} else {
+			assert!(chan_msgs.4.is_none());
+		}
 		if pending_raa.1 {
 			assert!(chan_msgs.3 == RAACommitmentOrder::RevokeAndACKFirst);
 			node_b.node.handle_revoke_and_ack(node_a_id, &chan_msgs.1.unwrap());

lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs

@@ -2559,6 +2559,7 @@ pub fn test_simple_peer_disconnect() {
 	nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(node_a_id);
 	let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
 	reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
+	reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs = (true, true);
 	reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 
 	let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1000000).0;
@@ -2716,22 +2717,29 @@ fn do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(messages_delivered: u8, simulate_broken
 		// received on either side, both sides will need to resend them.
 		let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
 		reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
+		if simulate_broken_lnd || messages_delivered > 0 {
+			reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs.0 = true;
+		}
+		reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs.1 = true;
 		reconnect_args.pending_htlc_adds.1 = 1;
 		reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 	} else if messages_delivered == 3 {
 		// nodes[0] still wants its RAA + commitment_signed
 		let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+		reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs = (true, true);
 		reconnect_args.pending_responding_commitment_signed.0 = true;
 		reconnect_args.pending_raa.0 = true;
 		reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 	} else if messages_delivered == 4 {
 		// nodes[0] still wants its commitment_signed
 		let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+		reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs.0 = true;
 		reconnect_args.pending_responding_commitment_signed.0 = true;
 		reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 	} else if messages_delivered == 5 {
 		// nodes[1] still wants its final RAA
 		let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+		reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs.0 = true;
 		reconnect_args.pending_raa.1 = true;
 		reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 	} else if messages_delivered == 6 {
@@ -2752,7 +2760,16 @@ fn do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(messages_delivered: u8, simulate_broken
 
 	nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(node_b_id);
 	nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(node_a_id);
-	reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
+	let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+	if !simulate_broken_lnd
+		&& (messages_delivered == 0 || (messages_delivered > 2 && messages_delivered < 6))
+	{
+		reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs.0 = true;
+	}
+	if messages_delivered < 4 {
+		reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs.1 = true;
+	}
+	reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 
 	nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
 
@@ -2850,6 +2867,10 @@ fn do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(messages_delivered: u8, simulate_broken
 	nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(node_a_id);
 	if messages_delivered < 2 {
 		let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+		if !simulate_broken_lnd && messages_delivered == 0 {
+			reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs.0 = true;
+		}
+		reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs.1 = true;
 		reconnect_args.pending_htlc_claims.0 = 1;
 		reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 		if messages_delivered < 1 {
@@ -2860,12 +2881,14 @@ fn do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(messages_delivered: u8, simulate_broken
 	} else if messages_delivered == 2 {
 		// nodes[0] still wants its RAA + commitment_signed
 		let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+		reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs.1 = true;
 		reconnect_args.pending_responding_commitment_signed.1 = true;
 		reconnect_args.pending_raa.1 = true;
 		reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 	} else if messages_delivered == 3 {
 		// nodes[0] still wants its commitment_signed
 		let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+		reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs.1 = true;
 		reconnect_args.pending_responding_commitment_signed.1 = true;
 		reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 	} else if messages_delivered == 4 {
@@ -2885,7 +2908,15 @@ fn do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(messages_delivered: u8, simulate_broken
 		nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(node_b_id);
 		nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(node_a_id);
 	}
-	reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
+	let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+	if !simulate_broken_lnd {
+		if messages_delivered == 0 {
+			reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs.0 = true;
+		} else if messages_delivered == 2 || messages_delivered == 3 {
+			reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs.1 = true;
+		}
+	}
+	reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 
 	if messages_delivered > 2 {
 		expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);

lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs

@@ -4858,6 +4858,7 @@ fn do_test_payment_metadata_consistency(do_reload: bool, do_modify: bool) {
 	}
 	let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[2], &nodes[3]);
 	reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
+	reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs = (true, true);
 	reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 
 	// Create a new channel between C and D as A will refuse to retry on the existing one because

lightning/src/ln/quiescence_tests.rs

@@ -755,6 +755,7 @@ fn do_test_quiescence_termination_on_disconnect(reload: bool) {
 
 	let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
 	reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
+	reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs = (true, true);
 	reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 
 	send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000);

lightning/src/ln/reorg_tests.rs

@@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ fn do_test_unconf_chan(reload_node: bool, reorg_after_reload: bool, use_funding_
 			// generate an error message we can handle below.
 			let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
 			reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
+			reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs = (true, true);
 			reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 		}
 	}

lightning/src/ln/splicing_tests.rs

@@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ fn do_test_splice_state_reset_on_disconnect(reload: bool) {
 
 	let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
 	reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
+	reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs = (true, true);
 	reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 
 	nodes[0]
@@ -457,6 +458,7 @@ fn do_test_splice_state_reset_on_disconnect(reload: bool) {
 
 	let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
 	reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
+	reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs = (true, true);
 	reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 
 	// Attempt a splice negotiation that completes, (i.e. `tx_signatures` are exchanged). Reconnecting
@@ -488,6 +490,7 @@ fn do_test_splice_state_reset_on_disconnect(reload: bool) {
 	}
 
 	let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+	reconnect_args.send_announcement_sigs = (true, true);
 	reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
 
 	mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &splice_tx);