@@ -3179,7 +3179,7 @@ macro_rules! emit_channel_pending_event {
31793179				counterparty_node_id: $channel.context.get_counterparty_node_id(),
31803180				user_channel_id: $channel.context.get_user_id(),
31813181				funding_txo: $channel.funding.get_funding_txo().unwrap().into_bitcoin_outpoint(),
3182- 				channel_type: Some($channel.context .get_channel_type().clone()),
3182+ 				channel_type: Some($channel.funding .get_channel_type().clone()),
31833183			}, None));
31843184			$channel.context.set_channel_pending_event_emitted();
31853185		}
@@ -3194,7 +3194,7 @@ macro_rules! emit_channel_ready_event {
31943194				channel_id: $channel.context.channel_id(),
31953195				user_channel_id: $channel.context.get_user_id(),
31963196				counterparty_node_id: $channel.context.get_counterparty_node_id(),
3197- 				channel_type: $channel.context .get_channel_type().clone(),
3197+ 				channel_type: $channel.funding .get_channel_type().clone(),
31983198			}, None));
31993199			$channel.context.set_channel_ready_event_emitted();
32003200		}
@@ -4341,7 +4341,7 @@ where
43414341			return Err(("Refusing to forward to a private channel based on our config.", 0x4000 | 10));
43424342		}
43434343		if let HopConnector::ShortChannelId(outgoing_scid) = next_packet.outgoing_connector {
4344- 			if chan.context .get_channel_type().supports_scid_privacy() && outgoing_scid != chan.context.outbound_scid_alias() {
4344+ 			if chan.funding .get_channel_type().supports_scid_privacy() && outgoing_scid != chan.context.outbound_scid_alias() {
43454345				// `option_scid_alias` (referred to in LDK as `scid_privacy`) means
43464346				// "refuse to forward unless the SCID alias was used", so we pretend
43474347				// we don't have the channel here.
@@ -6587,7 +6587,7 @@ where
65876587				for (chan_id, chan) in peer_state.channel_by_id.iter_mut()
65886588					.filter_map(|(chan_id, chan)| chan.as_funded_mut().map(|chan| (chan_id, chan)))
65896589				{
6590- 					let new_feerate = if chan.context .get_channel_type().supports_anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx() {
6590+ 					let new_feerate = if chan.funding .get_channel_type().supports_anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx() {
65916591						anchor_feerate
65926592					} else {
65936593						non_anchor_feerate
@@ -6644,7 +6644,7 @@ where
66446644					peer_state.channel_by_id.retain(|chan_id, chan| {
66456645						match chan.as_funded_mut() {
66466646							Some(funded_chan) => {
6647- 								let new_feerate = if funded_chan.context .get_channel_type().supports_anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx() {
6647+ 								let new_feerate = if funded_chan.funding .get_channel_type().supports_anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx() {
66486648									anchor_feerate
66496649								} else {
66506650									non_anchor_feerate
@@ -7939,7 +7939,7 @@ This indicates a bug inside LDK. Please report this error at https://github.com/
79397939		if accept_0conf {
79407940			// This should have been correctly configured by the call to Inbound(V1/V2)Channel::new.
79417941			debug_assert!(channel.context().minimum_depth().unwrap() == 0);
7942- 		} else if channel.context ().get_channel_type().requires_zero_conf() {
7942+ 		} else if channel.funding ().get_channel_type().requires_zero_conf() {
79437943			let send_msg_err_event = MessageSendEvent::HandleError {
79447944				node_id: channel.context().get_counterparty_node_id(),
79457945				action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage{
@@ -11553,7 +11553,7 @@ where
1155311553
1155411554		self.do_chain_event(Some(height), |channel| {
1155511555			let logger = WithChannelContext::from(&self.logger, &channel.context, None);
11556- 			if channel.context .get_channel_type().supports_anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx() {
11556+ 			if channel.funding .get_channel_type().supports_anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx() {
1155711557				if let Some(feerate) = min_anchor_feerate {
1155811558					channel.check_for_stale_feerate(&logger, feerate)?;
1155911559				}
0 commit comments