LSPS2ServiceHandler
API: Avoid explictly drop
ping locks
#4124
+88
−93
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #4059.
We previously added some explict
drop
s to make sure to drop locks before persisting. While clippy warned us about them, they seemed perfectly functional. However, it weirdly seems thatcargo
will run the same static analysis on dependencies, which has LDK Node builds fail with many dreaded 'isn'tSend
' error whenever we touch the asyncLSPS2ServiceHandler
API.Here, we simply believe clippy that this is a bad idea and use scoping over explict
drop
s to ensure we don't hold them anymore when persisting.Best reviewed with
git diff --ignore-all-space
, which makes the diff trivial.