|
| 1 | +package tapfreighter |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +import ( |
| 4 | + "context" |
| 5 | + "testing" |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | + "github.com/btcsuite/btcd/chaincfg/chainhash" |
| 8 | + "github.com/lightninglabs/taproot-assets/asset" |
| 9 | + "github.com/lightninglabs/taproot-assets/internal/test" |
| 10 | + "github.com/lightninglabs/taproot-assets/universe" |
| 11 | + "github.com/stretchr/testify/assert" |
| 12 | + "github.com/stretchr/testify/mock" |
| 13 | + "github.com/stretchr/testify/require" |
| 14 | +) |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +// MockBurnSupplyCommitter is a mock implementation of the BurnSupplyCommitter |
| 17 | +// interface for testing. |
| 18 | +type MockBurnSupplyCommitter struct { |
| 19 | + mock.Mock |
| 20 | +} |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +// MockDelegationKeyChecker is a mock implementation of the DelegationKeyChecker |
| 23 | +// interface for testing. |
| 24 | +type MockDelegationKeyChecker struct { |
| 25 | + mock.Mock |
| 26 | +} |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +// HasDelegationKey implements the DelegationKeyChecker interface. |
| 29 | +func (m *MockDelegationKeyChecker) HasDelegationKey(ctx context.Context, |
| 30 | + assetID asset.ID) (bool, error) { |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | + args := m.Called(ctx, assetID) |
| 33 | + return args.Bool(0), args.Error(1) |
| 34 | +} |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +// SendEvent implements the BurnSupplyCommitter interface. |
| 37 | +func (m *MockBurnSupplyCommitter) SendEvent(ctx context.Context, |
| 38 | + assetSpec asset.Specifier, event interface{}) error { |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | + args := m.Called(ctx, assetSpec, event) |
| 41 | + return args.Error(0) |
| 42 | +} |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +// SendBurnEvent implements the BurnSupplyCommitter interface. |
| 45 | +func (m *MockBurnSupplyCommitter) SendBurnEvent(ctx context.Context, |
| 46 | + assetSpec asset.Specifier, burnLeaf universe.BurnLeaf) error { |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | + args := m.Called(ctx, assetSpec, burnLeaf) |
| 49 | + return args.Error(0) |
| 50 | +} |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +// delegationKeyResult represents the result of a delegation key check. |
| 53 | +type delegationKeyResult struct { |
| 54 | + hasKey bool |
| 55 | + err error |
| 56 | +} |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +// chainPorterTestSetup holds the configuration for a chain porter test. |
| 59 | +type chainPorterTestSetup struct { |
| 60 | + burns []*AssetBurn |
| 61 | + delegationKeyResponses map[asset.ID]delegationKeyResult |
| 62 | + expectedBurnCalls int |
| 63 | + expectError bool |
| 64 | + expectNoManager bool |
| 65 | + managerError error |
| 66 | + invalidGroupKey bool |
| 67 | +} |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +// setupChainPorterTest creates a configured ChainPorter with mocks based on the test setup. |
| 70 | +func setupChainPorterTest(t *testing.T, |
| 71 | + ctx context.Context, setup chainPorterTestSetup, |
| 72 | +) (*ChainPorter, *MockBurnSupplyCommitter, *MockDelegationKeyChecker) { |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | + mockDelegationChecker := &MockDelegationKeyChecker{} |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | + // Only set up delegation key expectations if we have a manager. |
| 77 | + if !setup.expectNoManager { |
| 78 | + for assetID, result := range setup.delegationKeyResponses { |
| 79 | + mockDelegationChecker.On("HasDelegationKey", ctx, assetID). |
| 80 | + Return(result.hasKey, result.err) |
| 81 | + } |
| 82 | + } |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | + var ( |
| 85 | + mockManager *MockBurnSupplyCommitter |
| 86 | + manager BurnSupplyCommitter |
| 87 | + ) |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | + // If we expect a manager, set it up with the expected burn calls. |
| 90 | + if !setup.expectNoManager { |
| 91 | + mockManager = &MockBurnSupplyCommitter{} |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | + if setup.expectedBurnCalls > 0 { |
| 94 | + call := mockManager.On("SendBurnEvent", |
| 95 | + ctx, |
| 96 | + mock.AnythingOfType("asset.Specifier"), |
| 97 | + mock.AnythingOfType("universe.BurnLeaf")) |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | + if setup.managerError != nil { |
| 100 | + call.Return(setup.managerError) |
| 101 | + } else { |
| 102 | + call.Return(nil) |
| 103 | + } |
| 104 | + call.Times(setup.expectedBurnCalls) |
| 105 | + } |
| 106 | + manager = mockManager |
| 107 | + } |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | + porter := &ChainPorter{ |
| 110 | + cfg: &ChainPorterConfig{ |
| 111 | + BurnCommitter: manager, |
| 112 | + DelegationKeyChecker: mockDelegationChecker, |
| 113 | + }, |
| 114 | + } |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | + return porter, mockManager, mockDelegationChecker |
| 117 | +} |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +// TestChainPorterSupplyCommitEvents tests the comprehensive functionality of |
| 120 | +// supply commit burn event processing including delegation key filtering, error |
| 121 | +// handling, and various burn scenarios. |
| 122 | +func TestChainPorterSupplyCommitEvents(t *testing.T) { |
| 123 | + t.Parallel() |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | + ctx := context.Background() |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | + // We'll make some test data, including asset IDs, anchor transaction |
| 128 | + // ID, and a series of burns. |
| 129 | + assetID1 := asset.RandID(t) |
| 130 | + assetID2 := asset.RandID(t) |
| 131 | + assetID3 := asset.RandID(t) |
| 132 | + anchorTxid := chainhash.Hash{1, 2, 3, 4} |
| 133 | + groupKey := test.RandPubKey(t) |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | + // Create various burn scenarios |
| 136 | + burnWithoutGroup := &AssetBurn{ |
| 137 | + AssetID: assetID1[:], |
| 138 | + Amount: 1000, |
| 139 | + AnchorTxid: anchorTxid, |
| 140 | + GroupKey: nil, |
| 141 | + Note: "burn without group", |
| 142 | + } |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | + burnWithGroup := &AssetBurn{ |
| 145 | + AssetID: assetID2[:], |
| 146 | + Amount: 500, |
| 147 | + AnchorTxid: anchorTxid, |
| 148 | + GroupKey: groupKey.SerializeCompressed(), |
| 149 | + Note: "burn with group", |
| 150 | + } |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | + burnForFiltering := &AssetBurn{ |
| 153 | + AssetID: assetID3[:], |
| 154 | + Amount: 250, |
| 155 | + AnchorTxid: anchorTxid, |
| 156 | + GroupKey: nil, |
| 157 | + Note: "burn for filtering test", |
| 158 | + } |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | + burnWithInvalidGroup := &AssetBurn{ |
| 161 | + AssetID: assetID1[:], |
| 162 | + Amount: 100, |
| 163 | + AnchorTxid: anchorTxid, |
| 164 | + GroupKey: []byte{0xFF, 0xFF}, |
| 165 | + Note: "burn with invalid group", |
| 166 | + } |
| 167 | + |
| 168 | + tests := []struct { |
| 169 | + name string |
| 170 | + setup chainPorterTestSetup |
| 171 | + }{ |
| 172 | + { |
| 173 | + name: "successful burn events with mixed group keys", |
| 174 | + setup: chainPorterTestSetup{ |
| 175 | + burns: []*AssetBurn{ |
| 176 | + burnWithoutGroup, burnWithGroup, |
| 177 | + }, |
| 178 | + delegationKeyResponses: map[asset.ID]delegationKeyResult{ |
| 179 | + assetID1: {hasKey: true, err: nil}, |
| 180 | + assetID2: {hasKey: true, err: nil}, |
| 181 | + }, |
| 182 | + expectedBurnCalls: 2, |
| 183 | + expectError: false, |
| 184 | + }, |
| 185 | + }, |
| 186 | + { |
| 187 | + name: "delegation key filtering - only some have " + |
| 188 | + "delegation keys", |
| 189 | + setup: chainPorterTestSetup{ |
| 190 | + burns: []*AssetBurn{ |
| 191 | + burnWithoutGroup, burnWithGroup, burnForFiltering, |
| 192 | + }, |
| 193 | + delegationKeyResponses: map[asset.ID]delegationKeyResult{ |
| 194 | + assetID1: {hasKey: true, err: nil}, |
| 195 | + assetID2: {hasKey: false, err: nil}, |
| 196 | + assetID3: {hasKey: true, err: nil}, |
| 197 | + }, |
| 198 | + expectedBurnCalls: 2, |
| 199 | + expectError: false, |
| 200 | + }, |
| 201 | + }, |
| 202 | + { |
| 203 | + name: "delegation key filtering - no assets have " + |
| 204 | + "delegation keys", |
| 205 | + setup: chainPorterTestSetup{ |
| 206 | + burns: []*AssetBurn{ |
| 207 | + burnWithoutGroup, burnWithGroup, |
| 208 | + }, |
| 209 | + delegationKeyResponses: map[asset.ID]delegationKeyResult{ |
| 210 | + assetID1: {hasKey: false, err: nil}, |
| 211 | + assetID2: {hasKey: false, err: nil}, |
| 212 | + }, |
| 213 | + expectedBurnCalls: 0, |
| 214 | + expectError: false, |
| 215 | + }, |
| 216 | + }, |
| 217 | + { |
| 218 | + name: "delegation key checker error - filtered out " + |
| 219 | + "gracefully", |
| 220 | + setup: chainPorterTestSetup{ |
| 221 | + burns: []*AssetBurn{ |
| 222 | + burnWithoutGroup, burnWithGroup, |
| 223 | + }, |
| 224 | + delegationKeyResponses: map[asset.ID]delegationKeyResult{ |
| 225 | + assetID1: {hasKey: false, err: assert.AnError}, |
| 226 | + assetID2: {hasKey: true, err: nil}, |
| 227 | + }, |
| 228 | + expectedBurnCalls: 1, |
| 229 | + expectError: false, |
| 230 | + }, |
| 231 | + }, |
| 232 | + { |
| 233 | + name: "burn committer error", |
| 234 | + setup: chainPorterTestSetup{ |
| 235 | + burns: []*AssetBurn{burnWithoutGroup}, |
| 236 | + delegationKeyResponses: map[asset.ID]delegationKeyResult{ |
| 237 | + assetID1: {hasKey: true, err: nil}, |
| 238 | + }, |
| 239 | + expectedBurnCalls: 1, |
| 240 | + managerError: assert.AnError, |
| 241 | + expectError: true, |
| 242 | + }, |
| 243 | + }, |
| 244 | + { |
| 245 | + name: "no burn committer configured", |
| 246 | + setup: chainPorterTestSetup{ |
| 247 | + burns: []*AssetBurn{burnWithoutGroup, burnWithGroup}, |
| 248 | + delegationKeyResponses: map[asset.ID]delegationKeyResult{ |
| 249 | + assetID1: {hasKey: true, err: nil}, |
| 250 | + assetID2: {hasKey: true, err: nil}, |
| 251 | + }, |
| 252 | + expectNoManager: true, |
| 253 | + expectError: false, |
| 254 | + }, |
| 255 | + }, |
| 256 | + { |
| 257 | + name: "invalid group key bytes", |
| 258 | + setup: chainPorterTestSetup{ |
| 259 | + burns: []*AssetBurn{burnWithInvalidGroup}, |
| 260 | + delegationKeyResponses: map[asset.ID]delegationKeyResult{ |
| 261 | + assetID1: {hasKey: true, err: nil}, |
| 262 | + }, |
| 263 | + expectedBurnCalls: 0, |
| 264 | + expectError: true, |
| 265 | + }, |
| 266 | + }, |
| 267 | + } |
| 268 | + |
| 269 | + for _, tc := range tests { |
| 270 | + tc := tc |
| 271 | + t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) { |
| 272 | + t.Parallel() |
| 273 | + |
| 274 | + // We'll set up the test, call the method with the |
| 275 | + // specified args, then assert the results. |
| 276 | + porter, mockManager, mockDelegationChecker := setupChainPorterTest( |
| 277 | + t, ctx, tc.setup, |
| 278 | + ) |
| 279 | + |
| 280 | + // Execute the test |
| 281 | + err := porter.sendBurnSupplyCommitEvents(ctx, tc.setup.burns) |
| 282 | + |
| 283 | + if tc.setup.expectError { |
| 284 | + require.Error(t, err) |
| 285 | + } else { |
| 286 | + require.NoError(t, err) |
| 287 | + } |
| 288 | + |
| 289 | + if mockManager != nil { |
| 290 | + mockManager.AssertExpectations(t) |
| 291 | + } |
| 292 | + if !tc.setup.expectNoManager { |
| 293 | + mockDelegationChecker.AssertExpectations(t) |
| 294 | + } |
| 295 | + }) |
| 296 | + } |
| 297 | +} |
0 commit comments