Skip to content

Conversation

@karlseguin
Copy link
Collaborator

I think we initially thought we might need different clients for different parts of the system, each with a unique loop (e.g. we thought telemetry might need some isolation). But that never happened, so it's just needless now, especially since the async connect uses the non-generic *Loop type directly.

I think we initially thought we might need different clients for different
parts of the system, each with a unique loop  (e.g. we thought telemetry might
need some isolation). But that never happened, so it's just needless now,
especially since the async connect uses the non-generic *Loop type directly.
Copy link
Contributor

@sjorsdonkers sjorsdonkers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't see any code changes other than making the loop a field, so should be good.
(aside from generic change of course, and moving things around for testing)

@sjorsdonkers
Copy link
Contributor

Merging this for use in https proxy

@sjorsdonkers sjorsdonkers merged commit 455ed79 into main Jul 3, 2025
10 checks passed
@sjorsdonkers sjorsdonkers deleted the http_non_generic_loop branch July 3, 2025 13:10
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 3, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants