You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems to me, given frequency of commits and merged PRs, this would be correct. After several attempts to set up Forge, I realize that half of functionality was demolished and left legacy (just front). It's very disappointing. This is supported by lack of versioning (tags/releases). :(
In addition, there is problem with how to write PR. I see that Forge has formatting rules in pyproject.toml, but they are clearly not followed by many contributors.
Please tell me if in very near future task is to format Forge and revert workflow with tests to it as in AUTOMATIC1111?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
It seems to me, given frequency of commits and merged PRs, this would be correct. After several attempts to set up Forge, I realize that half of functionality was demolished and left legacy (just front). It's very disappointing. This is supported by lack of versioning (tags/releases). :(
In addition, there is problem with how to write PR. I see that Forge has formatting rules in pyproject.toml, but they are clearly not followed by many contributors.
Please tell me if in very near future task is to format Forge and revert workflow with tests to it as in AUTOMATIC1111?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions