[libc++] Optimize copy construction and assignment of __tree

Author: philnik777

libcxx/docs/ReleaseNotes/22.rst

@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ Implemented Papers
 Improvements and New Features
 -----------------------------
 
+- The performance of ``map::map(const map&)`` has been improved up to 2.3x
+- The performance of ``map::operator=(const map&)`` has been improved by up to 11x
+
 Deprecations and Removals
 -------------------------
 

libcxx/include/__tree

@@ -1213,6 +1213,100 @@ private:
     __node_pointer __cache_root_;
     __node_pointer __cache_elem_;
   };
+
+  class __tree_deleter {
+    __node_allocator& __alloc_;
+
+  public:
+    using pointer = __node_pointer;
+
+    _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __tree_deleter(__node_allocator& __alloc) : __alloc_(__alloc) {}
+
+#ifdef _LIBCPP_COMPILER_CLANG_BASED // FIXME: GCC complains about not being able to always_inline a recursive function
+    _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI
+#endif
+    void operator()(__node_pointer __ptr) {
+      if (!__ptr)
+        return;
+
+      (*this)(static_cast<__node_pointer>(__ptr->__left_));
+
+      auto __right = __ptr->__right_;
+
+      __node_traits::destroy(__alloc_, std::addressof(__ptr->__value_));
+      __node_traits::deallocate(__alloc_, __ptr, 1);
+
+      (*this)(static_cast<__node_pointer>(__right));
+    }
+  };
+
+  // This copy construction will always produce a correct red-black-tree assuming the incoming tree is correct, since we
+  // copy the exact structure 1:1. Since this is for copy construction _only_ we know that we get a correct tree. If we
+  // didn't get a correct tree, the invariants of __tree are broken and we have a much bigger problem than an improperly
+  // balanced tree.
+#ifdef _LIBCPP_COMPILER_CLANG_BASED // FIXME: GCC complains about not being able to always_inline a recursive function
+  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI
+#endif
+  __node_pointer __copy_construct_tree(__node_pointer __src) {
+    if (!__src)
+      return nullptr;
+
+    __node_holder __new_node = __construct_node(__src->__value_);
+
+    unique_ptr<__node, __tree_deleter> __left(
+        __copy_construct_tree(static_cast<__node_pointer>(__src->__left_)), __node_alloc_);
+    __node_pointer __right = __copy_construct_tree(static_cast<__node_pointer>(__src->__right_));
+
+    __node_pointer __new_node_ptr = __new_node.release();
+
+    __new_node_ptr->__is_black_ = __src->__is_black_;
+    __new_node_ptr->__left_     = static_cast<__node_base_pointer>(__left.release());
+    __new_node_ptr->__right_    = static_cast<__node_base_pointer>(__right);
+    if (__new_node_ptr->__left_)
+      __new_node_ptr->__left_->__parent_ = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__new_node_ptr);
+    if (__new_node_ptr->__right_)
+      __new_node_ptr->__right_->__parent_ = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__new_node_ptr);
+    return __new_node_ptr;
+  }
+
+  // This copy assignment will always produce a correct red-black-tree assumign the incoming tree is correct, since our
+  // own tree is a red-black-tree and the incoming tree is a red-black-tree. The invariants of a red-black-tree are
+  // temporarily not met until all of the incoming red-black tree is copied.
+#ifdef _LIBCPP_COMPILER_CLANG_BASED // FIXME: GCC complains about not being able to always_inline a recursive function
+  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI
+#endif
+  __node_pointer __copy_assign_tree(__node_pointer __dest, __node_pointer __src) {
+    if (!__src) {
+      destroy(__dest);
+      return nullptr;
+    }
+
+    __assign_value(__dest->__value_, __src->__value_);
+
+    // If we already have a left node in the destination tree, reuse it and copy-assign recursively
+    if (__dest->__left_) {
+      __dest->__left_ = static_cast<__node_base_pointer>(__copy_assign_tree(
+          static_cast<__node_pointer>(__dest->__left_), static_cast<__node_pointer>(__src->__left_)));
+
+      // Otherwise, we must create new nodes; copy-construct from here on
+    } else if (__src->__left_) {
+      auto __new_left       = __copy_construct_tree(static_cast<__node_pointer>(__src->__left_));
+      __dest->__left_       = static_cast<__node_base_pointer>(__new_left);
+      __new_left->__parent_ = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__dest);
+    }
+
+    // Identical to the left case above, just for the right nodes
+    if (__dest->__right_) {
+      __dest->__right_ = static_cast<__node_base_pointer>(__copy_assign_tree(
+          static_cast<__node_pointer>(__dest->__right_), static_cast<__node_pointer>(__src->__right_)));
+    } else if (__src->__right_) {
+      auto __new_right       = __copy_construct_tree(static_cast<__node_pointer>(__src->__right_));
+      __dest->__right_       = static_cast<__node_base_pointer>(__new_right);
+      __new_right->__parent_ = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__dest);
+    }
+
+    return __dest;
+  }
 };
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
@@ -1277,11 +1371,22 @@ __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::_DetachedTreeCache::__detach_next(__node_poin
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
 __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>& __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::operator=(const __tree& __t) {
-  if (this != std::addressof(__t)) {
-    value_comp() = __t.value_comp();
-    __copy_assign_alloc(__t);
-    __assign_multi(__t.begin(), __t.end());
+  if (this == std::addressof(__t))
+    return *this;
+
+  value_comp() = __t.value_comp();
+  __copy_assign_alloc(__t);
+
+  if (__size_ != 0) {
+    *__root_ptr() = static_cast<__node_base_pointer>(__copy_assign_tree(__root(), __t.__root()));
+  } else {
+    *__root_ptr() = static_cast<__node_base_pointer>(__copy_construct_tree(__t.__root()));
+    if (__root())
+      __root()->__parent_ = __end_node();
   }
+  __begin_node_ = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(std::__tree_min(static_cast<__node_base_pointer>(__end_node())));
+  __size_       = __t.size();
+
   return *this;
 }
 
@@ -1327,11 +1432,17 @@ void __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__assign_multi(_InputIterator __first, _
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
 __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__tree(const __tree& __t)
-    : __begin_node_(),
+    : __begin_node_(__end_node()),
       __node_alloc_(__node_traits::select_on_container_copy_construction(__t.__node_alloc())),
       __size_(0),
       __value_comp_(__t.value_comp()) {
-  __begin_node_ = __end_node();
+  if (__t.size() == 0)
+    return;
+
+  *__root_ptr()       = static_cast<__node_base_pointer>(__copy_construct_tree(__t.__root()));
+  __root()->__parent_ = __end_node();
+  __begin_node_ = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(std::__tree_min(static_cast<__node_base_pointer>(__end_node())));
+  __size_       = __t.size();
 }
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
@@ -1430,13 +1541,7 @@ __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::~__tree() {
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
 void __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::destroy(__node_pointer __nd) _NOEXCEPT {
-  if (__nd != nullptr) {
-    destroy(static_cast<__node_pointer>(__nd->__left_));
-    destroy(static_cast<__node_pointer>(__nd->__right_));
-    __node_allocator& __na = __node_alloc();
-    __node_traits::destroy(__na, std::addressof(__nd->__value_));
-    __node_traits::deallocate(__na, __nd, 1);
-  }
+  (__tree_deleter(__node_alloc_))(__nd);
 }
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>

libcxx/include/map

@@ -970,7 +970,7 @@ public:
       : map(from_range, std::forward<_Range>(__range), key_compare(), __a) {}
 #  endif
 
-  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI map(const map& __m) : __tree_(__m.__tree_) { insert(__m.begin(), __m.end()); }
+  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI map(const map& __m) = default;
 
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI map& operator=(const map& __m) = default;
 
@@ -1637,11 +1637,7 @@ public:
       : multimap(from_range, std::forward<_Range>(__range), key_compare(), __a) {}
 #  endif
 
-  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI multimap(const multimap& __m)
-      : __tree_(__m.__tree_.value_comp(),
-                __alloc_traits::select_on_container_copy_construction(__m.__tree_.__alloc())) {
-    insert(__m.begin(), __m.end());
-  }
+  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI multimap(const multimap& __m) = default;
 
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI multimap& operator=(const multimap& __m) = default;
 

libcxx/include/set

@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ public:
       : set(from_range, std::forward<_Range>(__range), key_compare(), __a) {}
 #  endif
 
-  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI set(const set& __s) : __tree_(__s.__tree_) { insert(__s.begin(), __s.end()); }
+  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI set(const set& __s) = default;
 
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI set& operator=(const set& __s) = default;
 
@@ -1119,11 +1119,7 @@ public:
       : multiset(from_range, std::forward<_Range>(__range), key_compare(), __a) {}
 #  endif
 
-  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI multiset(const multiset& __s)
-      : __tree_(__s.__tree_.value_comp(),
-                __alloc_traits::select_on_container_copy_construction(__s.__tree_.__alloc())) {
-    insert(__s.begin(), __s.end());
-  }
+  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI multiset(const multiset& __s) = default;
 
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI multiset& operator=(const multiset& __s) = default;
 

libcxx/test/benchmarks/containers/associative/associative_container_benchmarks.h

@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ void associative_container_benchmarks(std::string container) {
   /////////////////////////
   // Assignment
   /////////////////////////
-  bench("operator=(const&)", [=](auto& st) {
+  bench("operator=(const&) (into cleared Container)", [=](auto& st) {
     const std::size_t size = st.range(0);
     std::vector<Value> in  = make_value_types(generate_unique_keys(size));
     Container src(in.begin(), in.end());
@@ -172,6 +172,21 @@ void associative_container_benchmarks(std::string container) {
     }
   });
 
+  bench("operator=(const&) (into populated Container)", [=](auto& st) {
+    const std::size_t size = st.range(0);
+    std::vector<Value> in  = make_value_types(generate_unique_keys(size));
+    Container src(in.begin(), in.end());
+    Container c[BatchSize];
+
+    while (st.KeepRunningBatch(BatchSize)) {
+      for (std::size_t i = 0; i != BatchSize; ++i) {
+        c[i] = src;
+        benchmark::DoNotOptimize(c[i]);
+        benchmark::ClobberMemory();
+      }
+    }
+  });
+
   /////////////////////////
   // Insertion
   /////////////////////////

libcxx/test/benchmarks/containers/associative/map.bench.cpp

@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct support::adapt_operations<std::map<K, V>> {
 
 int main(int argc, char** argv) {
   support::associative_container_benchmarks<std::map<int, int>>("std::map<int, int>");
+  support::associative_container_benchmarks<std::map<std::string, int>>("std::map<std::string, int>");
 
   benchmark::Initialize(&argc, argv);
   benchmark::RunSpecifiedBenchmarks();

libcxx/test/benchmarks/containers/associative/multimap.bench.cpp

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct support::adapt_operations<std::multimap<K, V>> {
 
 int main(int argc, char** argv) {
   support::associative_container_benchmarks<std::multimap<int, int>>("std::multimap<int, int>");
+  support::associative_container_benchmarks<std::multimap<std::string, int>>("std::multimap<std::string, int>");
 
   benchmark::Initialize(&argc, argv);
   benchmark::RunSpecifiedBenchmarks();

libcxx/test/benchmarks/containers/associative/multiset.bench.cpp

@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct support::adapt_operations<std::multiset<K>> {
 
 int main(int argc, char** argv) {
   support::associative_container_benchmarks<std::multiset<int>>("std::multiset<int>");
+  support::associative_container_benchmarks<std::multiset<std::string>>("std::multiset<std::string>");
 
   benchmark::Initialize(&argc, argv);
   benchmark::RunSpecifiedBenchmarks();

libcxx/test/benchmarks/containers/associative/set.bench.cpp

@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct support::adapt_operations<std::set<K>> {
 
 int main(int argc, char** argv) {
   support::associative_container_benchmarks<std::set<int>>("std::set<int>");
+  support::associative_container_benchmarks<std::set<std::string>>("std::set<std::string>");
 
   benchmark::Initialize(&argc, argv);
   benchmark::RunSpecifiedBenchmarks();

libcxx/test/libcxx/gdb/gdb_pretty_printer_test.sh.cpp

@@ -324,6 +324,11 @@ void deque_test() {
 
 void map_test() {
   std::map<int, int> i_am_empty{};
+
+  // Make __tree_itertor being available in the debug info
+  // FIXME: Is there any way to avoid this requirement?
+  (void)i_am_empty.begin();
+
   ComparePrettyPrintToChars(i_am_empty, "std::map is empty");
 
   std::map<int, std::string> one_two_three;