[test] Make absolute line numbers relative; NFC

Done to remove noise from https://reviews.llvm.org/D32332 (and to make
this test more resilient to changes in general).

llvm-svn: 305947

Author: gburgessiv

clang/test/Sema/overloadable.c

@@ -106,8 +106,8 @@ void fn_type_conversions() {
   void foo(char *c) __attribute__((overloadable));
   void (*ptr1)(void *) = &foo;
   void (*ptr2)(char *) = &foo;
-  void (*ambiguous)(int *) = &foo; // expected-error{{initializing 'void (*)(int *)' with an expression of incompatible type '<overloaded function type>'}} expected-note@105{{candidate function}} expected-note@106{{candidate function}}
-  void *vp_ambiguous = &foo; // expected-error{{initializing 'void *' with an expression of incompatible type '<overloaded function type>'}} expected-note@105{{candidate function}} expected-note@106{{candidate function}}
+  void (*ambiguous)(int *) = &foo; // expected-error{{initializing 'void (*)(int *)' with an expression of incompatible type '<overloaded function type>'}} expected-note@-4{{candidate function}} expected-note@-3{{candidate function}}
+  void *vp_ambiguous = &foo; // expected-error{{initializing 'void *' with an expression of incompatible type '<overloaded function type>'}} expected-note@-5{{candidate function}} expected-note@-4{{candidate function}}
 
   void (*specific1)(int *) = (void (*)(void *))&foo; // expected-warning{{incompatible function pointer types initializing 'void (*)(int *)' with an expression of type 'void (*)(void *)'}}
   void *specific2 = (void (*)(void *))&foo;
@@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ void fn_type_conversions() {
   void disabled(char *c) __attribute__((overloadable, enable_if(1, "The function name lies.")));
   // To be clear, these should all point to the last overload of 'disabled'
   void (*dptr1)(char *c) = &disabled;
-  void (*dptr2)(void *c) = &disabled; // expected-warning{{incompatible pointer types initializing 'void (*)(void *)' with an expression of type '<overloaded function type>'}} expected-note@115{{candidate function made ineligible by enable_if}} expected-note@116{{candidate function made ineligible by enable_if}} expected-note@117{{candidate function has type mismatch at 1st parameter (expected 'void *' but has 'char *')}}
-  void (*dptr3)(int *c) = &disabled; // expected-warning{{incompatible pointer types initializing 'void (*)(int *)' with an expression of type '<overloaded function type>'}} expected-note@115{{candidate function made ineligible by enable_if}} expected-note@116{{candidate function made ineligible by enable_if}} expected-note@117{{candidate function has type mismatch at 1st parameter (expected 'int *' but has 'char *')}}
+  void (*dptr2)(void *c) = &disabled; // expected-warning{{incompatible pointer types initializing 'void (*)(void *)' with an expression of type '<overloaded function type>'}} expected-note@-5{{candidate function made ineligible by enable_if}} expected-note@-4{{candidate function made ineligible by enable_if}} expected-note@-3{{candidate function has type mismatch at 1st parameter (expected 'void *' but has 'char *')}}
+  void (*dptr3)(int *c) = &disabled; // expected-warning{{incompatible pointer types initializing 'void (*)(int *)' with an expression of type '<overloaded function type>'}} expected-note@-6{{candidate function made ineligible by enable_if}} expected-note@-5{{candidate function made ineligible by enable_if}} expected-note@-4{{candidate function has type mismatch at 1st parameter (expected 'int *' but has 'char *')}}
 
   void *specific_disabled = &disabled;
 }
@@ -131,14 +131,14 @@ void incompatible_pointer_type_conversions() {
   void foo(char *c) __attribute__((overloadable));
   void foo(short *c) __attribute__((overloadable));
   foo(charbuf);
-  foo(ucharbuf); // expected-error{{call to 'foo' is ambiguous}} expected-note@131{{candidate function}} expected-note@132{{candidate function}}
-  foo(intbuf); // expected-error{{call to 'foo' is ambiguous}} expected-note@131{{candidate function}} expected-note@132{{candidate function}}
+  foo(ucharbuf); // expected-error{{call to 'foo' is ambiguous}} expected-note@-3{{candidate function}} expected-note@-2{{candidate function}}
+  foo(intbuf); // expected-error{{call to 'foo' is ambiguous}} expected-note@-4{{candidate function}} expected-note@-3{{candidate function}}
 
   void bar(unsigned char *c) __attribute__((overloadable));
   void bar(signed char *c) __attribute__((overloadable));
-  bar(charbuf); // expected-error{{call to 'bar' is ambiguous}} expected-note@137{{candidate function}} expected-note@138{{candidate function}}
+  bar(charbuf); // expected-error{{call to 'bar' is ambiguous}} expected-note@-2{{candidate function}} expected-note@-1{{candidate function}}
   bar(ucharbuf);
-  bar(intbuf); // expected-error{{call to 'bar' is ambiguous}} expected-note@137{{candidate function}} expected-note@138{{candidate function}}
+  bar(intbuf); // expected-error{{call to 'bar' is ambiguous}} expected-note@-4{{candidate function}} expected-note@-3{{candidate function}}
 }
 
 void dropping_qualifiers_is_incompatible() {
@@ -148,8 +148,8 @@ void dropping_qualifiers_is_incompatible() {
   void foo(char *c) __attribute__((overloadable));
   void foo(const volatile unsigned char *c) __attribute__((overloadable));
 
-  foo(ccharbuf); // expected-error{{call to 'foo' is ambiguous}} expected-note@148{{candidate function}} expected-note@149{{candidate function}}
-  foo(vcharbuf); // expected-error{{call to 'foo' is ambiguous}} expected-note@148{{candidate function}} expected-note@149{{candidate function}}
+  foo(ccharbuf); // expected-error{{call to 'foo' is ambiguous}} expected-note@-3{{candidate function}} expected-note@-2{{candidate function}}
+  foo(vcharbuf); // expected-error{{call to 'foo' is ambiguous}} expected-note@-4{{candidate function}} expected-note@-3{{candidate function}}
 }
 
 // Bug: we used to treat `__typeof__(foo)` as though it was `__typeof__(&foo)`