Fix struct value printing for clang-repl in C mode

Author: anutosh491

clang/lib/Interpreter/InterpreterValuePrinter.cpp

@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ class InterfaceKindVisitor
   }
 
   InterfaceKind VisitReferenceType(const ReferenceType *Ty) {
-    ExprResult AddrOfE = S.CreateBuiltinUnaryOp(SourceLocation(), UO_AddrOf, E);
+    ExprResult AddrOfE = S.CreateBuiltinUnaryOp(SourceLocation(), UO_AddrOf, E->IgnoreImpCasts());
     assert(!AddrOfE.isInvalid() && "Can not create unary expression");
     Args.push_back(AddrOfE.get());
     return InterfaceKind::NoAlloc;
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ llvm::Expected<Expr *> Interpreter::convertExprToValue(Expr *E) {
   QualType DesugaredTy = Ty.getDesugaredType(Ctx);
 
   // For lvalue struct, we treat it as a reference.
-  if (DesugaredTy->isRecordType() && E->isLValue()) {
+  if (DesugaredTy->isRecordType() && E->IgnoreImpCasts()->isLValue()) {
     DesugaredTy = Ctx.getLValueReferenceType(DesugaredTy);
     Ty = Ctx.getLValueReferenceType(Ty);
   }

clang/test/Interpreter/pretty-print.c

@@ -78,14 +78,16 @@ int * null_ptr = (int*)0; null_ptr
 union U { int I; float F; } u; u.I = 12; u.I
 // CHECK-NEXT: (int) 12
 
-// TODO: _Bool, _Complex, _Atomic, and _BitInt
-// struct S1{} s1; s1
-// TODO-CHECK-NEXT: (S1 &) @0x{{[0-9a-f]+}}
+struct S1{} s1; s1
+// CHECK-NEXT: (S1 &) @0x{{[0-9a-f]+}}
+
+struct S2 {int d;} E = {22}; E
+// CHECK-NEXT: (struct S2 &) @0x{{[0-9a-f]+}}
 
-// struct S2 {int d;} E = {22}; E
-// TODO-CHECK-NEXT: (struct S2 &) @0x{{[0-9a-f]+}}
-// E.d
-// TODO-CHECK-NEXT: (int) 22
+E.d
+// CHECK-NEXT: (int) 22
+
+// TODO: _Bool, _Complex, _Atomic, and _BitInt
 
 // -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 // Tentative definition handling (C99 6.9.2)