[BOLT][AArch64] Fixes assertion errors occurred when perf2bolt was executed

BOLT only checks for the most common indirect branch pattern during
the branch analyzation. Extended the logic with two other indirect pattern
which slightly differs from the expected one.

Since these patterns are not related to JT, mark them as UNKNOWN branch.

Fixes: #83114

Author: kaadam

bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp

@@ -707,8 +707,16 @@ class AArch64MCPlusBuilder : public MCPlusBuilder {
     unsigned ShiftVal = AArch64_AM::getArithShiftValue(OperandExtension);
     AArch64_AM::ShiftExtendType ExtendType =
         AArch64_AM::getArithExtendType(OperandExtension);
-    if (ShiftVal != 2)
-      llvm_unreachable("Failed to match indirect branch! (fragment 2)");
+    if (ShiftVal != 2) {
+      // In this case the left shift amount is zero.
+      // The range could be 0 to 4.
+      //   adr     x6, 0x219fb0 <sigall_set+0x88>
+      //   add     x6, x6, x14, lsl #2
+      //   ldr     w7, [x6]
+      //   add     x6, x6, w7, sxtw => no shift amount
+      //   br      x6
+      return false;
+    }
 
     if (ExtendType == AArch64_AM::SXTB)
       ScaleValue = 1LL;
@@ -753,6 +761,16 @@ class AArch64MCPlusBuilder : public MCPlusBuilder {
       return true;
     }
 
+    if (DefJTBaseAdd->getOpcode() == AArch64::ADR) {
+      // Array indexing 'table branch'
+      //  adr     x13, 0x215a18 <_nl_value_type_LC_COLLATE+0x50>
+      //  ldrh    w13, [x13, w12, uxtw #1]
+      //  adr     x12, 0x247b30 <__gettextparse+0x5b0>
+      //  add     x13, x12, w13, sxth #2
+      //  br      x13
+      return false;
+    }
+
     assert(DefJTBaseAdd->getOpcode() == AArch64::ADDXri &&
            "Failed to match jump table base address pattern! (1)");