@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static void* operator_new_impl(std::size_t size) {
4343 return p;
4444}
4545
46- _LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION (_Znmw, void *, operator new , (std::size_t size)) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
46+ _LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION (_Znmw, void *, operator new , (std::size_t size)) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
4747 void * p = operator_new_impl (size);
4848 if (p == nullptr )
4949 __throw_bad_alloc_shim ();
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new(size_t size, const std::nothrow_t&) noexcept {
5454# ifdef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS
5555# if _LIBCPP_CAN_DETECT_OVERRIDDEN_FUNCTION
5656 _LIBCPP_ASSERT_SHIM (
57- !std::__is_function_overridden<std::__overload_of<void * (std::size_t )>(&operator new )>(),
57+ !std::__is_function_overridden<std::__overload_of<void *(std::size_t )>(&operator new )>(),
5858 " libc++ was configured with exceptions disabled and `operator new(size_t)` has been overridden, "
5959 " but `operator new(size_t, nothrow_t)` has not been overridden. This is problematic because "
6060 " `operator new(size_t, nothrow_t)` must call `operator new(size_t)`, which will terminate in case "
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new[](size_t size, const std::nothrow_t&) noexcept {
8282# ifdef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS
8383# if _LIBCPP_CAN_DETECT_OVERRIDDEN_FUNCTION
8484 _LIBCPP_ASSERT_SHIM (
85- !std::__is_function_overridden<std::__overload_of<void * (std::size_t )>(&operator new [])>(),
85+ !std::__is_function_overridden<std::__overload_of<void *(std::size_t )>(&operator new [])>(),
8686 " libc++ was configured with exceptions disabled and `operator new[](size_t)` has been overridden, "
8787 " but `operator new[](size_t, nothrow_t)` has not been overridden. This is problematic because "
8888 " `operator new[](size_t, nothrow_t)` must call `operator new[](size_t)`, which will terminate in case "
@@ -136,7 +136,8 @@ static void* operator_new_aligned_impl(std::size_t size, std::align_val_t alignm
136136 return p;
137137}
138138
139- _LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION (_ZnwmSt11align_val_t, void *, operator new , (std::size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment)) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
139+ _LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION (_ZnwmSt11align_val_t, void *, operator new , (std::size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment))
140+ _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
140141 void * p = operator_new_aligned_impl (size, alignment);
141142 if (p == nullptr )
142143 __throw_bad_alloc_shim ();
@@ -147,7 +148,7 @@ _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new(size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment, const s
147148# ifdef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS
148149# if _LIBCPP_CAN_DETECT_OVERRIDDEN_FUNCTION
149150 _LIBCPP_ASSERT_SHIM (
150- !std::__is_function_overridden<std::__overload_of<void * (std::size_t , std::align_val_t )>(&operator new )>(),
151+ !std::__is_function_overridden<std::__overload_of<void *(std::size_t , std::align_val_t )>(&operator new )>(),
151152 " libc++ was configured with exceptions disabled and `operator new(size_t, align_val_t)` has been overridden, "
152153 " but `operator new(size_t, align_val_t, nothrow_t)` has not been overridden. This is problematic because "
153154 " `operator new(size_t, align_val_t, nothrow_t)` must call `operator new(size_t, align_val_t)`, which will "
@@ -167,15 +168,16 @@ _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new(size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment, const s
167168# endif
168169}
169170
170- _LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION (_ZnamSt11align_val_t, void *, operator new [], (size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment)) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
171+ _LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION (_ZnamSt11align_val_t, void *, operator new [], (size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment))
172+ _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
171173 return ::operator new (size, alignment);
172174}
173175
174176_LIBCPP_WEAK void * operator new [](size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment, const std::nothrow_t &) noexcept {
175177# ifdef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS
176178# if _LIBCPP_CAN_DETECT_OVERRIDDEN_FUNCTION
177179 _LIBCPP_ASSERT_SHIM (
178- !std::__is_function_overridden<std::__overload_of<void * (std::size_t , std::align_val_t )>(&operator new [])>(),
180+ !std::__is_function_overridden<std::__overload_of<void *(std::size_t , std::align_val_t )>(&operator new [])>(),
179181 " libc++ was configured with exceptions disabled and `operator new[](size_t, align_val_t)` has been overridden, "
180182 " but `operator new[](size_t, align_val_t, nothrow_t)` has not been overridden. This is problematic because "
181183 " `operator new[](size_t, align_val_t, nothrow_t)` must call `operator new[](size_t, align_val_t)`, which will "
0 commit comments